期刊文献+

供应物流利益分配机制研究 被引量:11

Allocation mechanism in inbound logistics based on multi-principal and multi-agent model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以单供应商-单制造商-多个第三方物流企业组成的供应物流外包系统为对象进行研究,对直接外包模式和领导物流合作伙伴(LLP)模式下三方企业的利益分配问题进行讨论.建立多委托人-多代理人的成本整合模型并求解,比较分析了在直接外包模式与LLP模式下三方企业的成本分摊与利益分配情况.研究结果揭示:1)LLP模式与直接外包模式相比制造商的总收益增加,该部分收益增加来自于专业化分工;2)若LLP的保留效用不变,LLP专业化分工获得的额外收益全部被制造商从报酬支付中剥夺,并由制造商和供应商分享;3)LLP适当调整保留效用后,获得的报酬与直接外包方式一致,并与制造商共同分享额外收益. This paper investigates the allocation mechanisms in inbound logistics system consisting of single supplier,single manufacturer and multiple third party logistics providers.The aim is to compare profit sharing and cost allocation in two outsourcing modes,direct outsourcing and lead logistics partner(LLP).Multi-principal and multi-agent models are applied to investigate the system and solution procedures are proposed.Comparing the profit of all parties,results reveal that the manufacturer can obtain more profits in LLP mode than direct outsourcing,and the extra profits are generated from specialized management of LLP.When LLP's reserved utility is the same with direct sourcing mode,the extra profits contributed by LLP are deprived and allocated between the manufacturer and the supplier.When LLP increases its reserved utility,it can share the extra profits with the manufacturer,and its income is the same with direct outsourcing mode.
作者 周欣 霍佳震
出处 《管理科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第10期77-84,共8页 Journal of Management Sciences in China
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70772077) 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70832005)
关键词 供应物流 外包 利益分配 领导物流合作伙伴 多委托人-多代理人 inbound logistics outsourcing profits allocation lead logistics partner multi-principal and multi-agent model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Bask A H. Relationships among TPL providers and members of supply chains: A strategic perspective [ J ]. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 2001, 16(6) : 470 -486.
  • 2Jayaran J, Tan K. Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers[ J ]. International Jourual of Production Economics, 2010, 125(2) : 262 -271.
  • 3Wee H M. Supply chain management strategic alliances through LLP: Case study for automotive industry chain in Taiwan [ C ]. Conferences on Technology and Management, 2001.
  • 4Kumar N. Supply chain design at Jaguar: Bring Nirvana to Halewood [ J ]. Supply Chain Forum, 2002, 3 (1) : 74 -80.
  • 5Jung H, Chen F F, Jeong B. Decentralized supply chain planning framework for third party logistics partnership [ J ]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2008, 55 (2) : 348-364.
  • 6吴庆,但斌.物流服务水平影响市场需求变化的TPL协调合同[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(5):64-75. 被引量:58
  • 7公彦德,李帮义,刘涛.基于3PL和NASH谈判模型的三级SCC机制研究[J].预测,2009,28(2):60-65. 被引量:9
  • 8田宇.第三方物流服务分包管理中的质量博弈行为研究[J].管理科学,2006,19(2):2-5. 被引量:17
  • 9Simatupang T M, Sridharan R. The collaborative supply chain [ J ]. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2002, 13 (1) : 15 -30.
  • 10Maeho-Stadler I, Perez-Castrillo J D. Centralized and decentralized contracts in a moral hazard environment[ J]. The Jour nal of Industrial Economics, 1998, 46(4) : 489 -510.

二级参考文献59

共引文献86

同被引文献140

引证文献11

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部