期刊文献+

中小学综合素质评价主体选择问题探讨——基于利益相关者视角的分析 被引量:7

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 科学选择评价主体是综合素质评价成功实施的重要保证。现有研究虽已认可评价主体多元化,但就如何科学选择评价主体缺乏理论依据和科学方法。本文通过借鉴利益相关者分析方法,建构了中小学综合素质评价主体的范围,包括三类别七主体,并提出主体利益保障机制,为中小学综合素质评价主体选择问题的探讨提供新的视角。
出处 《当代教育科学》 北大核心 2014年第6期15-17,23,共4页 Contemporary Education Sciences
基金 重庆市社会科学规划项目"中小学综合素质评价研究"(批准号:2012YBJY068)阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1蔡敏.论教育评价的主体多元化[J].教育研究与实验,2003(1):21-25. 被引量:80
  • 2田凌辉.公共教育改革-利益与博彝[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.2011:156.160.269.
  • 3R.Edward Freeman. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach[Ml.London: Pitman, 1984.6.
  • 4Ronald K. Mitchell. Toward A Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience:Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1997. (22).
  • 5迈克尔·富兰.教育变革新意义[M].赵中建,陈霞,李敏译.北京:教育科学出版社,2005:46,51-52.
  • 6迈克尔·富兰.变革的力量-深度变革[M].北京:教育科学出版,2004.54,85.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Alkin, M. C. (1980). Uses and users of evaluation. In E.L. Baker(Eel. ), Evaluating federal education programs.
  • 2Bryk, A. S. (Ed.). (1983). Stakeholder - based evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 17. San Francisco, CA:Jossey- Bass.
  • 3Conway, J. A. (1984). The myth, mystery and mastery of participative decision making in education. Educational Administration Quarterly,20(3), 11-40.
  • 4Patton, M. Q. (1986). Utilization - focused evaluation( 2ndEd. ). Newbury, CA: Sage.
  • 5Cousins, J.B.&Earl,L.M. (1992).The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14 (4),397-418.
  • 6Fetterman, D. M. ( 1994 ). Empowerment evaluation. Evaluation Practice, 15(1), 1-15.
  • 7Fetterman, D. M. (1998). Empowerment evaluation and the Intemet: A synergistic relationship. Current Issues in Education[ On-line], 1 (4)
  • 8Holdaway, E. A. (1986). Making research matter. Alberta Journal of Education, 32(3) ,249-264.
  • 9Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal,27,363-391.
  • 10Mathisen, W. C. (1990).The Problem solving community :A valuable alternative to disciplinary communizes? Knowledge:Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 11,410 ~ 427.

共引文献114

同被引文献111

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部