摘要
文章回顾并研究了科学与伪科学的划界标准。逻辑实证主义的可证实标准和波普的可否证标准,提出了绝对的、逻辑的划界标准;库恩和拉卡托斯模糊了划界标准,使之成为相对标准;费伊阿本德从其相对主义与非理性主义的立场,提出消解划界标准;最终科学划界被置入更为广阔的视解,萨伽德的三要素标准与邦格的十要素标准,为科学划界提供了更为可信的多元标准。
The paper reviews demarcation criteria. Logical positivist's verifiability principle and Popper's falsifiability principle is an absolute and logical criteria. Kuhn and Lakatos blur the criteria and make it relative. From his point of view of relativism and irrationalism, Feyerabend tries to dissolve the demarcation problem. Finally, the demarcation problem is put into a wider perspective. Thagard's three-element criteria and Bunge's ten-element criteria give the more convincing plural criteria.
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第2期118-123,共6页
Studies in Science of Science
