摘要
目的探讨不同吸烟状况患者经皮冠状动脉介入术（PCI）术后6个月生活质量的差别。方法选取2009年7月至2010年5月住院治疗并符合研究纳入标准的患者172例，分为从不吸烟组83例、曾经吸烟组30例和目前吸烟组59例，在PCI术前24h和术后6个月使用SF-36量表和SAQ量表调查3组患者的生活质量水平，并分别按照调查量表的各个维度进行自身前后对照和组间对照。结果术前24h和术后6个月时，3组患者间SF-36和SAQ得分比较差异无统计学意义。术后6个月从不吸烟组和目前吸烟组在量表的多个维度得分均值较术前增高，曾经吸烟组反而降低。结论目前没有足够证据显示不同吸烟状况患者PCI术后6个月的生活质量改善情况差异显著，即不能认为吸烟患者在接受PCI后生活质量比曾经吸烟和从不吸烟患者更低，而本研究中曾经吸烟组患者在PCI后生活质量下降。
Objective To study heath-related quality of life in patients undergoing successful percutaneous coronary intervention（PCI）six months after operation. Methods 172 hospitalized patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected from July 2009 to May 2010. They were divided into the neversmoking group, ever-smoking group and the current-smoking group. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire （SAQ） and the Short Form-36 （SF-36）were used to assess the quality of life at baseline and 6 months after intervention. The comparison between groups and self-control comparison within groups were carried out according to each dimension of the questionnaire. Results SF-36 and SAQ score showed no significant difference 24h before the operation and 6 months after the operation between three groups. Patients who had never smoked and who were current smokers acquired higher scores in many dimensions of the questionnaire compared with those before operation, while patients who were former smokers reported reverse resuits. Conclusions There is no sufficient evidence proving that smoking status influences quality of life of patients after PCI, that is to say, it can not be considered that quality of life of smoking patients is lower than that of ever-smoking patients or never-smoking patients, since in this research, quality of life of eversmoking patients decreased after PCI.
出处
《中国实用护理杂志》
北大核心
2013年第10期66-69,共4页
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
关键词
冠心病
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
吸烟
随访
生活质量
Coronary heart disease
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Smoking
Follow-up
Quality of life
