摘要
在知识政治时代,专家参与成为政策科学化的重要保证。然而,在实践中,专家参与却面临着专业知识的可靠性与可及性、专家的民主性与可信性等诘问。这些诘问揭示了在证成专家参与合理性的技治主义和政策科学这两大理论传统中蕴含着四大张力和三重危机。为了消解这四大张力,从认知和行动层面推动专业知识的民主化与专家治理体制建设就成为根本路径。研究表明,专家参与经历了技治主义、工具主义和治理主义三种范式的变迁,变迁的内在动力是寻求科学性与民主性之间的平衡,这为当下中国专家参与制度的建设提供了重要启示。
In the era of knowledge politics,expert participation has become an important guarantee of scientific policy.However,expert participation is confronted with such questions as the reliability and accessibility of expertise,the credibility and democracy of experts in practice.These questions show that there is a certain internal tension in the two theoretical traditions of technocracy and policy science.In order to solve these tensions,democratization mechanism of expertise and governance system of expert should be established.The research shows that expert participation has experienced three paradigms of technocracy,instrumentalism and governance.Seeking the balance between science and democracy is the internal logic of the three paradigms,which provides important enlightenment for the construction of China’s expert participation system.
作者
张云昊
Zhang Yunhao(School of International Affairs and Public Administration,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100)
出处
《中国行政管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第1期98-104,共7页
Chinese Public Administration
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“当代中国专家体制的运行机制及其优化策略研究”(编号:18BSH104)
关键词
专家参与
内在张力
专业知识民主化
专家治理
expert participation
inherent tension
democratization of expertise
expert governance
