期刊文献+

就地热再生效果评估与关键影响因素分析

Evaluation of Geothermal Regeneration Effect and Analysis of Key Influencing Factors
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文针对高速公路路面就地热再生技术使用寿命的定量评价问题,应用数据挖掘技术,基于某地区高速公路路面就地热再生实施路段数据,对就地热再生技术的养护时效及其关键影响因素进行了综合评估。结果表明:该技术养护效果离散性大,平均养护时效约5年;生存分析显示其长期性能欠佳,25%分位值下的使用寿命仅为8.58年;原路面服役时间、交通流量以及中面层沥青是否采用改性材料是影响该技术效果的关键因素。该技术更适用于原路面服役时间短、交通等级重及以下,且中面层采用改性沥青的路段,以期实现更长的养护周期和更优的路面性能。 To quantitatively evaluate the service life of the in-place hot recycling technology among highway pavement maintenance measures,data mining techniques were applied to comprehensively assess the maintenance duration and its key influencing factors based on the in-place hot recycling data from a specific region highway.The results indicated that the technology’s maintenance effect exhibited significant dispersion.The average maintenance duration was approximately 5 years.Survival analysis further revealed its suboptimal long-term performance,with a service life of merely 8.58 years at the 25th percentile.The key factors influencing the technology’s effectiveness were identified as the service time of the original pavement,traffic volume,and whether modified materials were used for the middle asphalt layer.This technology is more suitable for sections with short service times of the original pavement,heavy traffic levels and below,and modified asphalt utilized in the middle layer,aiming to achieve longer maintenance cycles and superior pavement performance.
作者 周岚 ZHOU Lan(Nanjing Daorun Transportation Technology Co.,Ltd.,Nanjing Jiangsu 210000,China)
出处 《交通节能与环保》 2025年第6期132-135,共4页 Transport Energy Conservation & Environmental Protection
关键词 就地热再生 养护时效 生存分析 影响因素 in-place hot recycling technology maintenance duration survival analysis influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献58

  • 1张松见.沥青路面就地热再生(HIR)施工技术应用[J].青海交通科技,2010,22(S1):85-88. 被引量:2
  • 2杜骋,曹荣吉,符冠华.我国沥青路面再生技术适用性分析[J].公路交通科技(应用技术版),2008,4(S1):134-138. 被引量:14
  • 3Finn Fred. Pavement management systems:past, present and future [J]. Public Roads, 1998,62( 1 ) :16-23.
  • 4Kulkarni R B, Miller R W. Pavement management systems: past, present, and future [J]. Transportation Researeh Re- cord : Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2003, 1853:65-71.
  • 5Chen Chen, Gerardo W Flintsch. Fuzzy logic pavement maintenance and rehabilitation triggering approach for probabilistic life-cycle cost analysis [ J ]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007,1990 : 80- 91.
  • 6Syed Waqar Haider, Monther B Dwaikat. Estimating opti- mum timing for preventive maintenance treatment to miti- gate pavement roughness [ J ]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011,2235:43-53.
  • 7Li Qiang, She Xiaohong, Wang Kelvin C P, et al. Matter element analysis for optimal timing and preventive mainte- nance of pavements [ J ]. Transportation Research Re- cord : Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, 2150 : 18-27.
  • 8Peshkin D G, Hoerner T E, Zimmerman K A. Optimal ti- ming of pavement preventive maintenance treatment appli- cations [ R]. Washington D C: Transportation Research Board, 2004.
  • 9Design Information Bulletin 81 :Capital Preventive Mainte- nance ( CAPM ) Guidelines [ Z ]. Sacramento : California Department of Transportation, 2007.
  • 10Madanat S M, Sathaye N. Development of empirical- mechanistic pavement performance models using data from the washington state PMS database [ R ]. Berkeley : University of California Pavement Research Center, 2005.

共引文献93

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部