摘要
“猫头鹰”概念是专长研究在决策机制和公众参与方面的理论创新,旨在理顺专家与公众间关系。现有研究多停留在介绍和批判“猫头鹰”机制,而缺乏基于实际案例的探讨。文章以北京市责任规划师制度为例,探讨“猫头鹰”机制的现实可能性。北京市责任规划师制度在成员多样性、依赖专长、沟通交流、技术共识评估、理想功能实现等方面总体与“猫头鹰”机制相符,但在技术讨论与政治讨论两阶段、非主流成员与观点融入等方面仍存在局限性。这既体现出规划作为本地利益技术的特殊性,也说明“猫头鹰”机制仍受限于理论与实践的张力。
The“Owl”is a theoretical contribution of expertise studies in the field of decision-making mechanisms and public participation,aiming to straighten out the relationship between experts and the public.Existing research mostly focuses on introducing and criticizing the“Owl”mechanism,but lacks discussion based on empirical cases.This article takes Beijing’s responsible planner system as the case to explore the realistic feasibility of the“Owl”mechanism.Beijing’s responsible planner system is generally consistent with the“Owl”mechanism in terms of member diversity,reliance on expertise,communication,technical consensus assessment,and function realization.However,it still has limitations in terms of separated phases of technical discussion and political discussion,and the inclusion of non-mainstream members and opinions.This not only reflects the particularity of planning as a local-interest technology,but also shows that the“Owl”mechanism is still limited by the tension between theory and practice.
作者
冉奥博
史书豪
李明玺
RAN Aobo;SHI Shuhao;LI Mingxi(Think Tank Center,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084;School of Social Sciences,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084;School of Architecture,Tsinghua University,Beijing,100084)
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
北大核心
2025年第10期85-93,共9页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金
北京城市治理研究基地开放课题“城市更新中的数字治理——基于技术社会学视角”(项目编号:220240484)
国家自然科学基金面上项目“城市社区更新减碳绩效潜力评估研究”(项目编号:52278068)。
关键词
技术决策
专长与经验研究
责任规划师
STS
Technical decision
Studies of expertise and experience
Responsible planner
STS
