期刊文献+

眼部疼痛评估问卷的汉化及信效度检验

Sinicization of the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey and its reliability and validity test
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:将眼部疼痛评估问卷(OPAS)进行汉化并检验其信效度。方法:遵循Brislin翻译模型对英文版OPAS进行翻译,邀请专家对其进行文化调适,经预调查后形成中文版OPAS。采用方便抽样法,于2024年2月—6月选取江西省某三级甲等眼科专科医院的367例干眼门诊就诊病人进行调查,检验中文版OPAS的信度和效度。结果:中文版OPAS包括眼部疼痛强度、非眼部疼痛、生活质量、加重因素、相关因素5个维度,共22个条目。探索性因子分析提取5个公因子,累计方差贡献率为68.361%。验证因子分析结果显示模型拟合度良好。中文版OPAS量表水平的内容效度指数为0.973,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.818~1.000。中文版OPAS总分与修订版Wong-Baker面部表情疼痛评估法(FPS-R)得分的相关系数为0.621。量表总的Cronbach'sα系数为0.904,分半信度为0.846。结论:中文版OPAS具有良好的信度和效度,可作为评估我国眼科病人眼部疼痛的工具。 Objective:To translate the Ocular Pain Assessment Survey(OPAS)into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity.Methods:The English version of OPAS was translated following the Brislin translation model.Experts were invited to make cultural adaptations for it.After pre⁃investigation,the Chinese version of OPAS was formed.By using the convenient sampling method,a total of 367 outpatients visiting the dry eye outpatient department of a tertiary grade A ophthalmology specialist hospital in Jiangxi province from February to June 2024 were selected for investigation,to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of OPAS.Results:The Chinese version of OPAS included five dimensions:eye pain intensity,non⁃eye pain,quality of life,aggravating factors,and related factors,with a total of 22 items.Exploratory factor analysis extracted five common factors.And the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 68.361%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all indexes of the model were in the acceptable range.The scale⁃level content validity index(S⁃CVI)was 0.973.And the item⁃level content validity index(I⁃CVI)ranged from 0.818 to 1.000.The correlation coefficient between the total score of the Chinese version of OPAS and the score of the Wong⁃Baker Faces Pain Scale Revision(FPS⁃R)was 0.621.The total Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the scale was 0.904.And the Guttman split⁃half reliability was 0.846.Conclusions:The Chinese version of OPAS has good reliability and validity.It could be used as a tool for evaluating ocular pain in ophthalmic patients in China.
作者 高云倩 吴利 唐浪娟 梁慧 刘苗苗 GAO Yunqian;WU Li;TANG Langjuan;LIANG Hui;LIU Miaomiao(Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University,Jiangxi 330006 China;School of Nursing,Jiangxi Medical College,Nanchang University)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2025年第12期2044-2049,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 眼部疼痛 干眼 生活质量 信度 效度 量表研究 eye pain dry eye quality of life reliability validity scale research
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献54

  • 1刘祖国.干眼的治疗[J].中华眼科杂志,2006,42(1):71-74. 被引量:99
  • 2Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.
  • 3Lindell MK,Brandt CJ,Whitney DJ.A revised index of interrateragreement for multi-item ratings of a single target[J].Appl PsycholMeasurem,1999,23(2):127–135.
  • 4Lawshe CH.A quantitative approach to content validity[J].Personne Psychol,1975,28(4):563–575.
  • 5Hambleton RK,Swaminathan H,Algina J,et al.Criterion-referencedtesting and measurement:Review of technical issues anddevelopments[J].Rev Educat Res,1978,48(1):11–22.
  • 6Martuza VR.Applying norm-referenced and criterion-referenced measurement in education[M].Boston:Allyn andBacon,1977:275–293.
  • 7Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content validity[J].Nursing Res,1986,35(6):382–385.
  • 8Davis LL.Instrument review:Getting the most from your panel ofexperts[J].Appl Nurs Res,1992,5(4):194–197.
  • 9Polit DF,Beck CT.The content validity index:are you sure youknow what’s being reported?critique and recommendations[J].Res Nurs Health,2006,29(5):489–497.
  • 10Nora JJ.Causes old and new modes,mechanisms and models.Am Heart J,1993,125:1409

共引文献2007

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部