摘要
法学界关于司法的理论争论目前还聚焦于社会科学是否破坏形式法治,是否构成对法律(规范)科学的挑战,社会科学在司法中的运用限度等议题。但司法实践的情况完全不一样:一方面,新兴技术主要是信息技术对中国司法构成真正的挑战,另一方面,法官实际上按照自己的经验运用不同类型的科学。国内法学界对以上两方面都缺少理论反思。面对“科学”认识的差异,特别是不同科学带来的挑战,法学学者需要与法官加强联系,凝聚“科学”共识,有机整合规范科学、社会科学和信息技术等,才能更新并形成中国自主的法学知识体系。
Theoretical debates about judiciary in law academics in China are currently focused on whether social science undermines the rule of law, whether social science constitutes a challenge to legal( normative) science, and the limits of the application of social science in judiciary, etc. But the situation in judicial practice is completely different. On the one hand, emerging technologies, mainly information technology, pose a real challenge to the Chinese judiciary. On the other hand, judges actually apply different types of science according to their own experience. The law academics lack theoretical reflection on the above two aspects. Facing the different understandings of“ science”, especially the challenges of different sciences, legal scholars need to strengthen contact with judges, build a“ scientific” consensus, and organically integrate normative science, social science and information technology, etc., in order to update and form independence knowledge system of law in China.
出处
《法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第9期16-28,共13页
Law Science
关键词
规范科学
社会科学
信息技术
法学知识体系
normative science
social science
information technology
knowledge system of law
