摘要
对“银龙案”判决进行的分析表明,合同僵局在司法实践中面临定义界定不清、主观非恶意认定标准不明、唯结果论导致裁判要件适用不当等困境。合同僵局破解路径的优化可以从法官公开有关违约方主观状态心证过程、建立焦点情形专业评估机制两个方面入手。
At present,the business environment continues to optimize,and the dilemma of contract deadlock caused by the termination of the defaulting party is in a high trend and needs to be solved urgently.With the judgment of“Yinlong case”,it can be found that contract deadlock faces unclear definition in judicial practice;the standard of subjective non-malicious identification is unclear;and the improper application of judgment elements.Based on this,the optimization scheme of the solution path of contract deadlock requires the judges to disclose the subjective evidence process of the defaulting party,establish the professional evaluation mechanism of the focus situation.
作者
张晟炜
ZHANG Shengwei(Faculty of Law,Macao University of Science and Technology,Macao 999078,China)
关键词
合同僵局
违约方合同解除
银龙案
contract deadlock
contract termination of the breaching party
Yinlong case
