期刊文献+

符号互动论视角下教师非言语符号的课堂应用 被引量:1

A Study on the Classroom Application of Teachers’Non-verbal Signs under the Theory of Sign Interaction
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 经由符号互动论这一理论进路,教师非言语符号可在以往研究基础上开展进一步的学理认知。教师的非言语符号分为外在显性的身体传播和内在隐性的气质美学,在具体的课堂实践应用中,表现出角色与人际同步、情感与理性并重、主体与客体共生的理念。教师在进行非言语符号互动时,应依据不同情境前提进行特意选择,行动之中将受到结构性的约束,后期应适时倾听各方反馈、不断调试。在未来的创新路径中,教师非言语符号可通过常规姿态的陌生化、印象管理的多元化与媒介言语的网际化实现深化。 Through the theoretical approach of symbolic interactionism,teachers can develop further academic cognition on the basis of previous research on non-verbal symbols.Teachers’non-verbal symbols are divided into externally explicit body communication and internally implicit temperament aesthetics.In specific classroom practice applications,they show the concept of synchronization between roles and interpersonal relationship,equal emphasis on emotion and rationality,and symbiosis of subject and object.While interacting with non-verbal signs,teachers should make deliberate choices based on different contextual conditions,and they will be subject to structural constraints during their actions.Later,they should listen to feedback from all parties and constantly adjust them.In the future path of innovation,teachers’nonverbal symbols can be deepened through the defamiliarization of conventions,the diversification of impression management,and the internetization of media speech.
作者 张帅 ZHANG Shuai(School of International Journalism and Communication,Beijing Foreign Studies University,Beijing 100089,China)
出处 《晋城职业技术学院学报》 2022年第1期67-70,共4页 Journal of Jincheng Institute of Technology
关键词 符号互动论 教师 非言语符号 symbolic interactionism teacher non-verbal signs
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献27

  • 1别敦荣,李家新,韦莉娜.大学教学文化:概念、模式与创新[J].高等教育研究,2015,36(1):49-56. 被引量:64
  • 2于开莲.发展性评价与相关评价概念辨析[J].当代教育论坛(宏观教育研究),2007(3):36-38. 被引量:66
  • 3王炜.标准的尴尬与现实的焦虑:现行大学教师课堂教学评价的省思[J].浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版),2007,32(3):104-107. 被引量:9
  • 4CENTRA J A.Reflective Faculty Evaluation:Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness[M].San Franeisco:Jossey-Bass,1993.
  • 5POUNDER J S.Is Student Evaluation of Teaching Worthwhile?An Analytical Framework for Answering the Question[J].Quality Assurance in Education,1993,(2):178-191.
  • 6[美]威尔伯特·J·麦肯齐,等.麦肯齐大学教学精要:高等院校教师的策略、研究和理论[M].徐辉译.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2005.
  • 7HAMILTON D M,et al.The Effects of Using In-class Focus Groups on Student Course Evaluations[J].Journal of Education for Business,2002,(3):329-333.
  • 8MCGOWAN W R.Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Effects of Mid-course Evaluations on Learning and Teaching[D].Provo:Brigham Young University,2009.
  • 9SHUTE V J.Focus on Formative Feedback[J].Review of Educational Research,2008,(1):153-189.
  • 10MILMAN N B.The Mid-term Tune-up:Getting Student Feedback before It Is Too Late[J].Distance Learning,2006,(3):67.

共引文献18

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部