期刊文献+

失范与规范:高校学生学术不端行为及纠偏路径--基于惩处制度文本之维 被引量:6

Anomie and specification: academic misconduct and rectifying path of college student
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 构建与完善高校学生学术不端行为惩处制度是规范学术研究、重塑学术共同体学术责任伦理的内在旨意。通过以法律规范和政策规范的核心要素为分析标准对50所高校的惩处文本分析,发现高校制定的学生学术不端行为惩处制度存在功利化的价值观念有悖教育的整体目标、制度文本诸条目规范内容欠妥、制度文本完整性有待商榷等瑕疵,未能真正实现制度"善"与程序正义的学术善治愿景。为此,需要重塑惩处制度的价值观念、规范惩处制度文本内容以及建立惩处制度的问责制度来构建公平正义的高校学生学术不端行为惩处制度。 Building and improving the system of college student punishment of academic misconduct are the inner purposes of regulating academic research and reshaping the academic responsibility ethics of academic community. Taking the core elements of legal norms and policy standards as analysis criteria, we analyzed 50 colleges' punishment texts and found several flaws. Contrary to the overall goal of education, utilitarian value orientation exists in the students' academic misconduct punishment system formulated by colleges and universities. The specification content of system text entries is defective and its integrity also needs to be inspected. Hence, it fails to realize the goodness of system and the justice of procedure authentically. Therefore, we need to weigh the value orientation of punishment system, standardize the text of students' academic misconduct punishment, and establish the accountability system of punishment system to build a fair and legal system of college students' academic misconduct punishment.
作者 陈亮 康翠萍
出处 《大学教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第5期62-69,共8页 University Education Science
基金 重庆市研究生科研创新项目“高校学生学术不端行为问责制研究”(CYB16059) 教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目“法治高校建设研究:基于责任与问责的视角”(15YJC880003)
关键词 高校学生 学术不端行为 惩处制度 制度“善” 公平正义 college students academic misconduct punishment system "goodness" of system fairness and justice
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1.[美]托马斯·麦卡锡.哈贝马斯的批判理论[M].王江涛译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,2010.
  • 2李晓燕.学术自由、学术规范与学术秩序治理[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,39(6):14-22. 被引量:21
  • 3教育部.高等学校预防与处理学术不端行为办法(征求意见稿)(2016-04-13)[2016-05-20]http://www.moe.edu.cn/jyb-xwfb/s248/201604/t20160413_238121.html.
  • 4教育部.学位论文作假处理办法[EB/OL].(2012-11-13)[2016-09-06]http://www.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/moe一621/201406/170437.html.
  • 5季卫东.法律程序的形式性与实质性——以对程序理论的批判和批判理论的程序化为线索[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,43(1):109-131. 被引量:163
  • 6姚建宗.中国特色社会主义法的价值论[J].辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,41(2):14-26. 被引量:10
  • 7金生铉.教育与正义--教育正义的哲学想象[M].福州:福建教育出版社,2013:45.
  • 8[古希腊]亚里士多德 吴寿彭译.政治学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1965..
  • 9郑文樾,张佩珍等译.乌申斯基教育文选[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1991..
  • 10Harvard Kennedy School Academic Code[EB/ OL]. (2011-06-22)[2015-07-17]http ..//www. hks. harvard, edu/degrees/registrar/procedures/ integrity.

共引文献885

同被引文献77

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部