期刊文献+

谈甲烷与氯气反应的教学误区 被引量:3

Misunderstanding in Teaching of Reaction between Methane and Chlorine
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对有机化合物和取代反应概念的建构分析,表明甲烷与氯气反应在有机化学教学中有重要的地位。通过理论和实验手段,对日常教学中存在的一些见解,如反应条件(光源的选择)、反应产物种类数、产物的验证方法、反应物的比例、实验危险性等进行了剖析,并提出了甲烷与氯气反应的实验方案。根据教学误区产生的原因,提出了减少和消除教学误区的努力方向。 This paper discussed the construction of the concept of organic compounds and substitution reaction, which showed that the reaction between methane and chlorine played an important role in organic chemistry teaching. Analyzed the misunderstanding of the conditions (such as the selection of light source), the types of products, the verification method of prod- ucts, the ratio of the reactants and the risks of the experiment of the reaction between methane and chlorine using theoretical and experimental methods, and put forward an improved experi- ment program and the directions to eliminate the misunderstanding of teaching.
作者 周存军
出处 《化学教育》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第15期66-68,共3页 Chinese Journal of Chemical Education
基金 江苏省教育科学“十二五”规划课题“提升高中理科教师命题能力的研究”(课题编号:C-c/2013/02/014)
关键词 教学误区 实验改进 甲烷 氯气 misunderstanding of teaching experiment improvement methane chlorine
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献27

  • 1朱华英,刘怀乐.对甲烷取代反应的实验探索[J].教学仪器与实验(中学版),2004,20(8):48-48. 被引量:1
  • 2刘江田.真实性化学问题命题研究[J].化学教育,2007,28(1):13-16. 被引量:17
  • 3Corcoran T F A Mosher, A Rogat. Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform [R]. Philadelphi: Consortitum for Policy Research in Education, 2009.
  • 4National Research Council [NRC]. Taking Scienee to School : Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8 [M].Washington: National Academies Press, 2007.
  • 5Duncan R G, C E Hmelo-Silver. Learning Progressions: Aligning Curriculum, Instruction, and Assessment [J].Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2009, 46 (6) 606-609.
  • 6National Research Council [ NRC]. Knonwing What Students Know: the Science and Design of Educational Assessment [M]. Washington: National Academies Press, 2001: 297-304.
  • 7Kennedy C A, et al. Using Progress Variables and Embedded Assessment to Improve Teaching and Learning[R]. Montreal: the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, 2005: 1-53.
  • 8Kennedy C A, M Wilson. Using Progress Variables to Interpret Student Achievement and Progress [R]. BEAR Technical Report. Berkeley: Berkeley Evaluation & Assessment Research ( BEAR ) Center, 2007: 1-53.
  • 9Clasesgens J. et al. Perspective of a Chemist: A Framework to Promote Conceptual Understanding of Chemistry [R]. New Orleans: the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 2002: 1-26.
  • 10Catley K, R Lehrer, B Reiser. Tracing a Prospective Learning Progression for Developing Understanding of Evolution [R].Washington: National Reseraeh Council, 2005: 1-60.

共引文献43

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部