期刊文献+

子宫肌腺症保守治疗分级方案的选择 被引量:2

Classified conservative treatment for adenomyosis:a preliminary observation
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的观察促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)和左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统(LNG-IUS)分级治疗方案对于子宫不同程度增大的子宫肌腺症的疗效。方法选取2010年1月-2013年12月于复旦大学附属妇产科医院诊断为子宫肌腺症的92例患者,将其分入轻度增大LNG-IUS组(11例)、轻度增大联合治疗组(20例)、中度增大联合治疗组(39例)、重度增大联合治疗组(13例)和单纯GnRHa治疗组(9例),分别于治疗前(T0),注射GnRHa后1(T1)、2(T2)、3(T3)、6个月(T4),以及放置LNG-IUS后1(t1)、3(t2)、6(t3)、12(t4)、24(t5)、36个月(t6)时随访1次,对比治疗前后患者的子宫体积、血清CA125水平、痛经和月经情况,并记录患者LNG-IUS脱落和续用情况,观察不同治疗方案的疗效。结果轻度增大LNG-IUS组患者在t3至t5时间点的子宫体积,轻度增大联合治疗组患者在T1(即t1)、T2、T3(即t2)和t3至t5时间点的子宫体积,中度增大联合治疗组患者在T1至T3、t1至t4时间点的子宫体积,重度增大联合治疗组患者在T1至T4、t1至t3时间点的子宫体积均显著小于同组T0时间点(P值均<0.05)。轻度增大LNG-IUS组患者在t2至t6时间点的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS评分),轻度和中度增大联合治疗组患者在t1至t6时间点的疼痛VAS评分,重度增大联合治疗组患者在t1至t4时间点的疼痛VAS评分均显著低于同组T0时间点(P值均<0.05);轻度和中度增大联合治疗组抑制痛经的时间持续≥3年,重度增大联合治疗组抑制痛经的时间持续<2年;轻度增大联合治疗组患者在t1、t2时间点的疼痛VAS评分显著低于轻度增大LNG-IUS组同时间点(P值均<0.05)。轻度增大LNGIUS组和轻度增大联合治疗组患者在t2、t3时间点的CA125水平,中度增大联合治疗组患者在T3、t2、t3时间点的CA125水平,重度增大联合治疗组患者在T3、T4、t2、t3时间点的CA125水平均显著低于同组T0时间点(P值均<0.05)。轻度增大LNG-IUS组患者在t3时间点的CA125水平显著低于同组t2时间点(P<0.05),中度增大联合治疗组患者在t2时间点的CA125水平显著低于同组T3时间点(P<0.05)。轻度、中度和重度增大联合治疗组患者在t2时间点的CA125水平均显著低于轻度增大LNG-IUS组同时间点(P值均<0.05),轻度增大联合治疗组患者在t3时间点的CA125水平显著低于重度增大联合治疗组同时间点(P<0.05)。在随访期间,83例放置LNG-IUS的患者中,发生环脱落5例,其中轻度增大LNG-IUS组1例,中度增大联合治疗组2例,重度增大联合治疗组2例;发生环位下移6例,其中轻度增大LNG-IUS组1例,轻度增大联合治疗组1例,中度增大联合治疗组2例,重度增大联合治疗组2例。更改治疗方案15例,其中轻度增大LNG-IUS组1例,中度增大联合治疗组4例,重度增大联合治疗组10例。结论对于子宫增大不明显、症状不严重的肌腺症患者,可单用LNG-IUS治疗;对于子宫中度增大的肌腺症患者,可采用先注射GnRHa 3针预处理后放置LNG-IUS的联合治疗方案;对于子宫增大严重的肌腺症患者,GnRHa联合LNG-IUS治疗方案的总体疗效和满意度较低,可行保守性手术后再联合GnRHa和LNG-IUS治疗。 Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of classified conservative treatment for adenomyosis using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) combined with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa). Methods A total of 92 patients diagnosed as adenomyosis between January 2010 andDecember 2013 were treated by using LNG-IUS or LNG-IUS combined with GnRHa. Of them, 11 patients with mildly enlarged uterus (group A) underwent solo LNG-IUS, other 20 patients with mildly enlarged uterus (group B) received LNG-IUS combined with GnRHa, 39 with moderately enlarged uterus (group C) and 13 with severely enlarged uterus (group D) also received combined treatment, and other 9 with severely enlarged uterus were treated only by GnRHa (group E). Follow-up was taken at the following time points~ pretreatment (To), 1 month (T1), 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T4) after injection of GnRHa, 1 month (tl), 3 months (t2), 6 months (t3), 12 months (t4), 24 months (t5) and 36 months (t6) after placing LNG-IUS. During follow-up, the size of uterus and serum 0A125 were measured, and dysmenorrheal, menstrual cycles, and continuous use of LNG-IUS were recorded. Results Compared with that at To, uterus in group A at t3to t5, in group B at T1 (tl) ,T2, T3 (t2), and t3 to t5, in group C at T1 to T3, and t1 to t4, in group D at T1 to T4, and tlto t3 were significantly decreased Call P〈 0.05). Compared with that at To, visual analogue scale (VAS) score in group A at t2to t6, in group B and C at t1 to t6, in group D at t1 to t4 were also significantly decreased Call P〈0.05). Dysmenorrhea were inhibited at least 3 years in group A, B and C, while less than 2 years in group D. VAS score in group B were significantly less than those in group A at tt and t2 (both P〈0.05). Compared with that at To, serum level of CA125 in group A and B at t2 and t3, in group C at T3, t2 and t3, in group D at T3, t4, t2 and T3 were significantly decreased Call P〈0.05). Serum level of 0A125 in group A at t3 was significantly lower than that at t2 (P〈0.05). Serum CA125 level in group C at t2 was significantly lower than that at T3(P〈0.05). Serum CA125 level in group B, C and D at t2 were significantly lower than those in group A Call P〈0.05). Serum CA125 level in group B at t3 was significantly lower than that in group D (P〈0.05). During follow-up, LNG-IUS fell off in 5 patients Cone in group A, two in group C and another two in group D) and moved down in 6 patients (one in group A, another one in group B, two in group C and another two in group D). Treatment plan was changed in 15 patients Cone in group A, four in group C and 10 in group D). Conclusion LNG-IUS refers to the adenomyosis patients with normal or mildly enlarged uterus and mild symptoms. For those with moderately enlarged uterus, GnRHa can be used at first for 3 months and then LNG- iUS is placed. For those with severely enlarged uterus, the over-all effect of GnRHa combined LNG-IUS treatment is not satisfying, so patients should be suggested to undergo conservative surgical treatment followed by GnRHa and LNG-IUS.
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期239-244,共6页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 子宫肌腺症 保守治疗 促性腺激素释放激素激动剂 左炔诺孕酮宫内节育系统 Adenomyosis Conservative treatment Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献67

  • 1邓姗,郎景和,冷金花,刘珠凤,孙大为,朱兰.左炔诺孕酮宫内缓释系统用于防治子宫内膜异位症和子宫腺肌病的临床观察[J].中华妇产科杂志,2006,41(10):664-668. 被引量:71
  • 2周应芳,吴北生,李辉,郑淑蓉.CA_(125)测定对子宫肌腺病的诊断价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,1996,31(10):590-593. 被引量:73
  • 3Bragheto AM, Caserta N, Bahamondes L, et al. Effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in the treatment of adenomyosis diagnosed and monitored by magnetic resonance imaging [J~. Contraception, 2007, 76 (3): 195-9.
  • 4ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Intrauterine devices and intrauterine systems[J]. Hum Reprod Update, 2008, 14(3): 197-208.
  • 5Sheng J, Zhang WY, Zhang JP, et al. The LNG-IUS study on adenomyosis: a 3-year follow-up study on the efficacy and side effects of the use of levonorgestrel intrauterine system for the treatment of dysmenorrhea associated with adenomyosis[J]. Contraception, 2009, 79(3): 189-93.
  • 6Wang PH, Su WH, Sheu BC, et al. Adenomyosis and its variance: adenomyoma and female fertility[J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 48(3): 232-8.
  • 7Bush E, Kepner J, Smiley S, et al. Assessment of menorrhagia in females followed for bleeding disorders at the hemophilia center of Western New York-correlation between clinical presentation and laboratory parameters [ J ]. Blood, 2006, 108 ( 11 ): 3984.
  • 8Cho S, Nam A, Kim H, et al. Clinical effects of the levonorgestrel- releasing intrauterine device in patients with adenomyosis [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 198(4): 373e1-7.
  • 9Petta CA, Ferdani RA, Abrao MS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and a depot GnRH analogue for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain in women with endometriosis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(7): 1993-8.
  • 10Laoag-Fernandez JB,Maruo T,Pakarinen P,et al.Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system on the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and adrenomedullin in the endometrium in adenomyosis.Hum Reprod,2003,18:694-699.

共引文献188

同被引文献36

引证文献2

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部