期刊文献+

应激影响风险决策的研究进展 被引量:4

原文传递
导出
摘要 情绪对风险决策的影响一直以来都是心理学研究的核心问题.研究者相继提出了躯体标记假说和神经情感决策理论等,试图从不同的角度解释情绪是如何影响风险决策的.随着研究的深入,情绪的分类越来越细,既包含快乐、悲伤、愤怒、恐惧等基本情绪,也包括焦虑、抑郁、应激等复合情绪.其中,应激(特别是心理应激)作为一种特殊的情绪状态,与个体的生存和健康均密切相关,应激与推理、决策等高级认知活动的关系问题日益受到研究者的关注,并逐渐成为情绪、决策研究领域的热点问题.
作者 徐四华 方杰
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1138-1140,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题项目(DBA130220)
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1Selye H. The stress of my life [M J. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1979: t02-t03.
  • 2Lighthall NR,Mather M,Gorlick MA.Acute stress increases sex differences in risk seeking in the balloon analogue risk task [J] . PLoS One, 2009,4(7) :e6002.
  • 3Porcelli AJ , Delgado MR. Acute stress modulates risk taking in financial decision making[J].Psychol Sci,2009,20(3) :278-283.
  • 4Brevers D, Koritzky G, Bechara A, et al. Cognitive processes underlying impaired decision-making under uncertainty in gambling disorder [J]. Addict Behav, 2014, 39( to) : 1533-1536.
  • 5Aite A, Barrault S, Cassotti M, et al. The impact of alexithymia on pathological gamblers' decision making: a preliminary study of gamblers recruited in n sportsbook n casions [J]. Cogn Behav Neurol, 2014,27 (2) :59-67.
  • 6Walk J, SUtterlin S, Koch S, et al. Enhanced cardiac pereception predicts impaired performance in the Iowa Gambling Task in patients wit panic disorderj L]. Brain Behav,2014,4(2) :238-246.
  • 7Gullo MJ, Stieger AA.Anticipatory stress restores decision-making deficits in heavy drinkers by increasing sensitivity to losses [J]. Drug Alcohol Depend, 2011 ,117 (2-3) : 204-2tO.
  • 8De Martino B, Kumaran D, Seymour B, et al. Frames, biases, and rational decision- making in the human brain [J]. Science, 2006, 313 (5787) :684-687.
  • 9Pruessner JC, Dedovic K, Pruessner M, et al. Stress regulation in the central nervous system: evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging studies in human populations - 2008 Curt Richter Award Winner[J]. Psychoneuroendocrinology ,20tO,35( 1) : 179-191.
  • 10Liston C, McEwen BS, Casey BJ. Psychosocial stress reversibly disrupts prefrontal processing and attentional control [J]. Proc Nat! Acad Sci USA,2009,106(3) :912-917.

二级参考文献139

  • 1Adair, L. W., & Weingart, L. (2007). The timing and function of offers in U.S. and Japanese Negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1056 - 1068.
  • 2Ash, K. I., & Jennifer, W. (2008). Hindsight bias in insight and mathematical problem-solving: evidence of different reconstruction mechanisms for metacognitive vs. situational judgments. Memory & Cognition, 36, 822 - 837.
  • 3Brewer, N. T., & Chapman, G.. B. (2002). The fragile basic anchoring effect. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 65 - 77.
  • 4Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G.. B., Schwartz, J.A., & Bergus, G.. R. (2007). The influence of irrelevant anchors on the judgments and choices of doctors and patients. Medical Decision Making, 27, 203 -211.
  • 5Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002). Incorporating the irrelevant: Anchors in judgments of belief and value. In: T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman, Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment.(pp. 120 - 138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2001). Putting adjustment back in the anchoring and adjustment heuristic: Differential processing of self-generated and experimenter-provided anchors. Psychological Science, 12, 391-396.
  • 7Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2004). Are adjustments insufficient? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 447-460.
  • 8Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2005). When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: Differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 18, 199 - 212.
  • 9Epley, N., & Gilovich, T. (2006).The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic Why the adjustments are insufficient. Psychology Science, 17, 311 - 318.
  • 10Epley, N., & I(eysar, B. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327 - 339.

共引文献125

同被引文献51

  • 1龚耀先,蔡太生.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表[J].中国临床心理学杂志,1994,2(1):1-6. 被引量:137
  • 2朴松花,李春玉.焦虑的概念分析[J].吉林医学,2007,28(2):181-182. 被引量:32
  • 3戴晓阳.常用心理评估量表手册[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011:13-19.
  • 4Bradley MM,Codispoti M,Cuthbert BN,et al.Emotion and motivation I:defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing[J].Emo- tion,2001,1(3):276-298.
  • 5Carver CS,Harmon-Jones E.Anger is an approach-related affect:evi- dence and implications[J].Psychol Bull,2009,135(2):183-204.
  • 6Harle KM,Sanfey AG.Effects of approach and withdrawal motivation on interactive economic decisions[J].Cogn Emot,2010,24(8):1456-1465.
  • 7Schaefer A,Nils F,Sanchez X,et al.Assessing the effectiveness of a large database of emotion-eliciting films:A new tool for emotion re- searchers[J].Cogn Emot,2010,24(7):1153-1172.
  • 8Li X,Lu ZL,D^Argembeau A,et al.The Iowa Gambling Task in fMRI images[J].Human Brain Mapp,2010,31(3):410-423.
  • 9Mapelli D,Di Rosa E,Cavalletti M,et al.Decision and dopaminergic system:an ERPs study of Iowa gambling task in Parkinson' s disease f J].Front Psychol,2014,5:684.
  • 10Philippot P.Inducing and assessing differentiated emotion-feeling states in the laboratory[J].Cogn Emot,1993,7(2):171-193.

引证文献4

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部