摘要
目的比较脑梗死患者与健康对照组及美国被试的风险决策差异;研究脑梗死患者的人格类型特征对其风险决策的影响。方法改编经典"亚洲疾病"实验,分别以正/负框架进行描述。270名脑梗死患者及180名健康对照组分别被随机分为两组完成风险决策,脑梗死患者同时完成MBTI量表。结果在正面框架下,三组的风险倾向有统计学差异(χ2=45.47,P<0.01);在负面框架下,三组均表现为明显的风险寻求(χ2=0.442.47,P>0.05)。脑梗死患者在内向、感觉、情感、感知4个人格维度框架效应显著;在外向、直觉、思维、判断4个维度上被试的判断受框架影响较小。结论风险决策存在中西方文化差异,中国被试倾向于风险寻求;被试的决策行为还会受到个体性格特征的巨大影响,表现出不同的倾向性。
Objective To study the differences in risk decision making among the cerebral infarction group ,healthy control group, and the United States group ,and the influence of personality traits of patients with cerebral infarction upon their risk decisions .Methods Classic ＆quot;Asian disease＆quot;Scenario was adapted ,and 270 patients with cerebral infarction and 180 healthy people as control group were randomly divided into two groups （ positive /negative framework ） to complete the risk decision options .Every participants completed MB-TI questionnaire.Results There were significant differences among three groups in the positive frame （χ^2 =45.47,P〈0.01）.In the negative frame,all of three groups showed risk -seeking preference.Patients with cerebral infarction showed significant framing effect in introversion,sensing,feeling,and perceiving dimensions ,while they were uninfluenced in extroversion ,intuition,thinking,and judgment dimensions.Conclusion There is cultural difference of risk decision making between Eastern and Western ,and Chinese subjects tend to risk seeking.Furthermore,decision-making behaviors of the subjects are also affected by individuals＇personality traits.
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2014年第9期1339-1341,共3页
China Journal of Health Psychology
基金
国家自然科学青年基金项目(编号:31000461)
北京市自然科学基金(编号:7123230)
关键词
脑梗死
框架效应
人格特征
风险决策
心身医学
Cerebral infarction
Framing effect
personality traits
Risk decision making
Psychosomatic medicine
