摘要
"蓝箱"不仅是大国间贸易利益博弈的产物,而且由于其免于削减承诺,事实上已成为某些发达国家固有的特权,对农产品贸易的扭曲作用不可忽视。多哈回合"蓝箱"规则谈判的近期成果——2008年的"模式草案"虽严格限定了"蓝箱"使用纪律,为发展中国家提供了若干特殊与差别的待遇,但却从另一方面扩大了"蓝箱"的作用空间,使惯以使用"蓝箱"的发达国家继续从中获利。作为一个从未使用过"蓝箱"的农产品贸易大国,我国将会因之面临更加不利的竞争局面。故在即将重启的多哈回合农业谈判中,我国宏观上应继续恪守发展中国家的原则与立场,提高发达国家的"蓝箱"使用标准;微观上则应把握改革时机,采取更为灵活的谈判策略,促使发达国家对"蓝箱"支持进行实质性削减。与此同时,我国也应当对现行的国内农业补贴制度进行适时的调整与优化,以里外配合,形成合力,为我国未来农业的长远健康发展创造一个良好的内外部规则环境。
The ＂blue box＂ support is not only the outcome of trade benefits gambling between major powers but also has factually become inherent privilege of some developed countries because of its exempting from reduction, which has distorting impact on agricultural trade. The recent achievement of agriculture negotiation in the Doha Round - the draft modalities of 2008 makes more strict rules to regulate the ＂blue box＂ support and offers special and differential treatments for developing countries. However, it expands the definition of the ＂blue box＂ , so that some developed countries relying on it could reap the benefits from using this kind of domestic support. This situation undoubtedly puts China which has never used the ＂blue box＂ at a serious disadvantageous situation though China has become a giant of agriculture trade. Consequently from macrocosmic perspective, we should get a clear understanding of the resistance in the negotiation process, insist on our stand- point as a developing country and microscopically we should lose no chance for reforming, taking more flexible negotiation strategies to make the criterion of the developed countries＇ using the ＂blue box＂ more strictly to promote their substantial reduction on agricultural domestic support.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第2期139-151,共13页
Modern Law Science
基金
2012年福建省高等学校杰出青年科研人才培育计划资助项目"法律化视角下的国际经济秩序重构与我国的对策"(JA12022S)
2011年华侨大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(JK-SB1141)
关键词
国内支持
“蓝箱”
《框架协议》
模式草案
domestic support
the ＂blue box＂
the ＂framework＂
the draft modalities
