期刊文献+

内侧支撑在锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折中的作用 被引量:19

Importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]探讨内侧支撑在锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折中维持骨折复位的应用。[方法]2008年7月~2012年3月采用锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折,最终临床资料完整者41例,男16例,女25例,年龄38~89岁,平均69岁,随访时间12-24个月,平均16个月,每次摄x线片都测量相对钢板的“肱骨头高度”,根据术后x线片视肱骨近端内侧柱支撑重建情况,分为有内侧支撑组(A组)23例、没有内侧支撑组(B组)18例。在术后1周内(T1)、术后3个月(T2)、术后1年(T3)摄X线片测量“肱骨头高度”,并计算在术后至术后3个月(T1~T2)、术后3个月~术后1年(T2~T3)期间高度变化。在T2、T3时期用Neer疗效评定标准对术后肩关节功能进行评定。[结果]A、B组术后并发症例数卡方检验差异有统计学意义(X2=4.12,P〈0.05)。在T1-T2:期间A组“肱骨头高度”丢失程度少于B组,两组间差异有统计学意义(t=-30.33,P〈0.01);在T2-T3 期间两组“肱骨头高度”丢失程度差异没有统计学意义(t=-1.84,P〉0.05)。在T2时期、T3时期A组Neer百分法功能评定值(分)均高于B组,两组间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。[结论]锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折中有内侧支撑者,能更好维持骨折复位,减少术后并发症。 [Objective] To investigate the importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. [ Method ] Between July 2008 and March 2012,41 patients (16 men and 25 women, mean age, 69 years [ 38 - 89 years ] )with coherent unstable proximal humeral fractures were treated with locking plate fixation, with a mean follow - up period of 16 months( 12 -24 months). The humeral head height relative to the plate was measured from the radiographs of each patient. One independent examiner evaluated postoperative radiographs of the shoulder to divide the patients into a group who underwent ade- quate medial column reconstruction ( group A, 23 cases) and those who underwent inadequate medial column reconstruction (group B, 18 cases). The patients were evaluated using outpatient physical examination data, radiographs,humeral head height values, and 1 - week ( T1 ), 3 - month ( T2 ) , and 1 - year ( T3 ) postoperative Neer scores. [ Result ] The incidence rate of locking plate complications was significantly different(x2 = 4. 12, P 〈 0.05 ) between group A and group B. The loss of humeral head height over T1 to T2 was greater in group B than in group A ,with a statistically significant difference( t = - 30. 33 ,P 〈 0.01 ). However, over T2 to T3 , this loss was not significantly different ( t = - 1.84, P 〉 0.05 ). According to the Neer scoring system, the scores of group A were significantly higher than those of group B at T2 and T3 (P 〈 0.01 ). [ Conclusion] Mechanical support of the medial region allows for better maintenance of reduction, thereby reducing the incidence of locking plate complications in proximal humerus fractures.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第4期299-303,共5页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 肱骨近端骨折 锁定钢板 骨折内固定 proximal humeral fractures, locking plate, fracture internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献53

  • 1黄强,王满宜,荣国威.复杂肱骨近端骨折的手术治疗[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(3):159-164. 被引量:198
  • 2曾炳芳,罗从风.重视骨折并发症的处理[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2006,8(7):601-602. 被引量:24
  • 3Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fracture. Part I. Classfication and evaluation [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970,6 : 1077 - 1089.
  • 4Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop, 1987,214 : 160 - 164.
  • 5Duralde XA, Leddy LR. The results of ORIF of displaced unstableproximal humeral fractures using a locking plate [ J ]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2010,4:480 - 488.
  • 6Gallo RA, Zeiders G J, Altman GT. Two-incision technique for treatment of complex proximal humerus fractures [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005,10:734 - 740.
  • 7Gardner M J, Boraiah S, Helfet DL,et al. The anterolateral acromial approach for fractures of the proximal humerus [ J ]. J Orthop Trauma, 2008,2 : 132 - 137.
  • 8Gardner M J, Griffth MH, Dines JS, et al. The extended anterolateral acromial approach allows minimally invasive access to the proximal humerus [J]. Clin Orthop,2005,434 : 123 - 129.
  • 9Lind T,Krer K,Jensen J.The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1989,108(5):285-287.
  • 10Kannus KP,Palvanen M,Niemi S,et al.Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007[J].Bone,2009,44(4):656-659.

共引文献93

同被引文献157

  • 1张长青,苏琰,曾炳芳.肱骨近端锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床分析及手术技巧[J].中华手外科杂志,2005,21(5):262-264. 被引量:40
  • 2何寒青,陈坤.Meta分析中的异质性检验方法[J].中国卫生统计,2006,23(6):486-487. 被引量:108
  • 3Knierim AE, Bollinger A J, Wirth MA, et al. Short, locked humeral nailing via Neviaser portal:an anatomic study[ JJ. J Orthop Trauma, 2013,27(2) :63 -67.
  • 4Ricchetti ET, Warrender W J, Abboud JA. Use of locking plates in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures[ J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010,19(2) :66 -75.
  • 5Aksu N, Gogntl~ A, Kara AN,et al. Complications encountered in prox- imal humerus fractures treated with locking plate fixation [ J ]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Ture,2010,44(2) :89 -96.
  • 6Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, et al. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures [J]. Injury,2011,42 (ll) :1283 - 1288.
  • 7Bigorre N,Talha A,Cmnier P,et al. A prospective study of a new locking plate for proximal humeral fracture[J]. Injury,2009 ,40 :192 -196.
  • 8Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures:part I. Classifica- tion and evaluation. 1970 [ J ]. Clin Orthop,2006 ,442 :77 - 82.
  • 9Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, et al. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus [ J ]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2004,13:427 - 433.
  • 10Agel J, Jones CB, Sanzone AG, et al. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with Polams nail fixation[ J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2004, 13:19l - 195.

引证文献19

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部