期刊文献+

问题解决学习活动中批判性思维发展的特征 被引量:9

The Development Characteristics of Critical Thinking in Problem-Solving Learning Activities
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 问题解决在线学习活动强调将学习活动置于有意义的问题情境中,通过个人或小组协作的方式来解决问题。问题解决的过程与批判性思维的发展密不可分,批判性思维是问题解决学习活动中重要的认知加工过程。Newman等学者提出的批判性思维模型详细界定了批判性思维的发展层级及其表现,可用于量化分析在线学习活动中的交互文本内容,而话语分析技术可以从质性角度确保交互文本分析的完整意义。通过设计案例并运用这两种分析工具可以揭示出问题解决学习活动中批判性思维发展的特征:一是批判性思维各层级出现的频率是不一样的,各种表现的量化比例可以表明批判性思维发展的层级;二是批判性思维质量与构建问题空间及形成问题解决策略的效果密切相关;三是在问题解决的不同阶段批判性思维发展的过程和互动结构不同。 Through the way of group collaboration or individuals to solve problems, problem-solving online learning activities highlights that learning activities should be introduced into a truthful, meaningful problem situation. It is inseparable between the development of critical thinking and problem-solving process. Critical thinking is an important cognitive process in problem-solving learning activities. The critical thinking model made by Newman gives a detailed definition of hierarchies of critical thinking. The model is used to make a quantitative analysis of interactive text in online learning activities. Discourse analysis is used to enable the researchers to grasp the complete meanings of interactive text analysis. This research revealed the characteristics of critical thinking by case designs and application of Newman's critical thinking model and discourse analysis. It is shown in the research that: firstly, the frequency of critical thinking hierarchies is different and quantitative proportions can demonstrate the development of critical thinking; secondly, the quality of critical thinking is closely related with problem-space construction and effects of problem-solving strategy; thirdly, the development of critical thinking and its interactive structure are different in the stages of problem-solving process.
作者 马志强
出处 《现代远程教育研究》 CSSCI 2013年第2期31-37,共7页 Modern Distance Education Research
基金 全国教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度教育部青年课题"基于问题解决的在线学习环境设计研究"(ECA120335) 国家社科基金"十一五"规划2009年度教育学一般课题"网络环境下中学理解性教学的实验研究"(BCA090078)
关键词 问题解决 批判性思维 在线协作学习 在线学习活动 话语分析 Problem-Solving Critical Thinking Online Collaborative Learning Online Learning Activities Discourse Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1[美]罗伯特·K.殷(2010).案例研究:设计与方法[M].周海涛,李永贤,李虔.重庆:重庆大学出版社:3-6.
  • 2[美]罗杰·D.维曼,约瑟夫·R.多米尼克(2005).大众媒介研究导论(第七版)[M].金兼斌,陈可,郭栋梁等.北京:清华大学出版社:150-170.
  • 3柴少明,李克东.话语分析-研究CSCL中协作意义建构的新方法[J].现代教育技术,2009,19(6):79-82. 被引量:12
  • 4李松,张进宝,徐琤.在线学习活动设计研究[J].现代远程教育研究,2010,22(4):68-72. 被引量:65
  • 5Garrison,D.R.(1992).Critical Thinking and Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education:An Analysis of Responsibility and Control Issues[J].Aduh Education Quarterly,42(3): 136-148.
  • 6Kedinger, F.N.&Lee,H.B.(2000).Foundatiom of Behavioral Research(4th)[M].New York:Holt,Rinehart&Winston.
  • 7Newman,D.R.,Webb,B.&Cochrane,C.(1995).A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-To-Face and Computer Supported Group Leaming[J].Interpersonal Computing and Technology,3(2):56-77.
  • 8Schellens,T.,Van Keer,H.&De Wever, B. et a1.(2009). Tagging Thinking Types in Asynchronous Discussion Groups: Effects on Critical Thinking[J].Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1):77-94.
  • 9Scriven,M.&Paul,R.(1992).Critical Thinking Defined[C] Critical Thinking Conference.Atlanta,GA.

二级参考文献24

  • 1马博森.话语分析及其方法(概述)[J].外语与外语教学,1999(3):11-14. 被引量:16
  • 2武法提.目标导向网络课程的课程设计[J].中国电化教育,2006(4):78-81. 被引量:22
  • 3浙江省富阳市职业高级中学课题组,赵玉星.自学辅导教学模式的构建与实施[J].上海教育科研,2006(11):87-88. 被引量:7
  • 4桑新民.学习科学与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
  • 5Koschmann,T.Dewey's contribution to the foundations of CSCL research,In Proceedings of Computer Support for Collaborative Learning Boulder[M].CO,2002.
  • 6Arnseth,H.C.Discourse and artefactsinlearningto argue[D].Unpublished PhD thesis.Oslo:Oslo University,2004.
  • 7Kumpulainen,K & Wray,D.Analysing interactions during collaborative writing with the computer:An innovative methodology[EB/OL].<http://www.warwick.ac.uk/staff/D.J.Wray/Articles/facct.htm,2008-03-23.>
  • 8Van Dijk,T.A.Discourse Studies:A Multidisciplinary Introduction.Vol 1-2[C].London:SAGE Publications,1997.
  • 9Edwards,D & Potter.Discursive psychology.In AmcHoul &M.Rapley(FAs.)How to analyze talk in institutional settings.A casebook of methods[M].London:Continuum,2001.
  • 10Gee,P.,& Green,L.Discourse analysis,learning,and social practice:A methodological study[J].Review of Research in Education,1998:119-169.

共引文献74

同被引文献115

引证文献9

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部