期刊文献+

Up and Down法与寇氏法测定破伤风毒素LD_(50)的比较 被引量:5

Comparison between Up-and-Down Procedure and Karber Test in Determining Tetanus Toxin LD_(50) in Mice
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较研究Up and Down法与寇氏法测定破伤风毒素LD50值。方法 NIH小鼠皮下注射破伤风毒素,分别使用寇氏法和Up and Down法计算LD50值。结果同一破伤风毒素经寇氏法计算得LD50值为4.97ng/Kg体重,Up and Down法计算LD50值为4.93 ng/Kg体重,95%置信区间为(4.71~5.13)ng/Kg体重。结论应用Up and Down法可测出与寇氏法相同结果的LD50值,且动物使用数量仅用8只。 Objective To compare the efficacy of Dixon and Mood up-and-down method and Karber method in determining tetanus toxin LD50 in mice.Methods Tetanus toxin in a dose of 0.5 mL at concentration of 0.329,0.311,0.295,0.280,0.267 or 0.256 ng/mL was subcutaneously injected into NIH mice.The LD50 of tetanus toxin was determined by Dixon and Mood up-and-down procedure and Karber test.Results The LD50 of tetanus toxin was 4.97 ng/kg body weight measured by Karber method,and 4.93 ng/Kg body weight by the up-and-down procedure.Conclusions Both Dixon and Mood up-and-down procedure and Karber test can achieve the same LD50 of tetanus toxin,but the up-and-down procedure is more simple and convenient,and 8 animals are enough for this test.
出处 《中国比较医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第12期28-30,共3页 Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine
关键词 寇氏法 Up and Down法 破伤风毒素 LD50 Karber Up-and-down procedure Dixon and Mood Tetanus toxin LD50 Mouse
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1张林媛,孙金秀.上下增减剂量法与Horn’s法测定LD_(50)的研究[J].卫生毒理学杂志,2003,17(4):234-236. 被引量:13
  • 2OECD/OCDE. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals.Acute Oral Toxicity : Up-and-Down Procedure. 425. Adopted : 17Dec,2001,1.11.
  • 3OECD/CDE. OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals.Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure. 425. Adopted: 21Sept, 1998,1 -6.

二级参考文献1

  • 1GB 15670-1995.农药登记毒理学试验方法[S],1995.

共引文献12

同被引文献54

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部