期刊文献+

3.0TMR快速电影相位对比成像对稳态流体模型的定量测量研究 被引量:1

The quantitative measurement of steady fluid flow phantom by using 3.0 T MR Fast Cine-PC
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的建立稳态流体模型,验证3.0TMR快速电影相位对比(Fast Cinephase Contrast,FastCine-PC)成像进行脑脊液流体动力学测量的准确性,同时优化成像参数。方法将直径为3.0mm的医用塑料输液管固定在水模中,塑料管的一端连接高压注射器,另一端连接容器。高压注射器以预设的不同流速向塑料管内注射0.9%氯化钠溶液。将流体模型中心置于标准头部8通道线圈中心,塑料管长轴与流体长轴一致。应用3.0T高场强MR扫描仪进行FastCINEPC序列扫描,扫描层面垂直于管腔长轴。在不同流速、不同流速编码(Velocity Encoding,VENC)、不同流动方向、不同倾斜角度情况下分别测量流速。然后对结果进行统计学分析。结果当流体流速在1.41~12.74cm/s(接近人体脑脊液流速范围),流速编码置于20cm/s时所测得流速与真实流速最接近,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);液体流动方向与流速编码方向相同、方向相反测得的流速二者之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);流体管腔给予不同角度后测得的各流速值之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 3.0TMR快速电影相位对比序列可以准确定量测量稳态流体模型流速,为人体脑脊液动力学的研究提供可靠的实验依据。 Objective To set up a steady fluid flow phantom to verify the accuracy of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fast cine phase contrast (fast cine-PC )in measuring cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hydrokinetics, and to optimize the imaging parameters. Methods A plastic tube with diameter being 3.0 mm was fixed in a water phantom, and one end of the tube was connected to the high pressure injector for injecting physiological saline at different velocity, however, the other one was inserted into a container. The phantom was placed in the center of a 8-channel array head coil. The tube was parallelly placed with the major axis of magnet. By means of 3.0T high field MR fast cine-PC, scanning plane was perpendicular to the major axis of tube. The different velocity with different velocity encoding ( VENC ), in different direction of flow, at different angles was measured. Finally, the experimental results were statistically analyzed. Results When the physiological saline flow velocity was from 1.41cm/s to 12.74 cm/s and the velocity encoding was 20cm/s, there was no significant difference between the measured velocity and actual velocity( P 〉 0.05 ) , and there was no significant difference in the measured velocity in different flow direction of liquid whether the direction was identical with VENC or opposite to VENC ( P 〉 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in the measured velocity at different angles ( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion 3.0T MR fast cine-PC is more accurate in the measurement of velocity of steady fluid flow phantom, and can provide reliable experimental basis for the study on human CSF hydrokinetics.
出处 《河北医药》 CAS 2012年第22期3382-3385,共4页 Hebei Medical Journal
关键词 磁共振成像 电影相位对比 脑脊液 magnetic resonance imaging cine phase contrast cerebrospinal fluid
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Bradley WG, Whittemort AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void : indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal- pressure hydrocphaluses. Radiology, 1991,178:459-466.
  • 2Feinberg DA, Mark AS. Human brain motion and cerebrospinal fluid cir- culation demonstrated with MR velocity imaging. Radiology, 1987,163 : 793 -799.
  • 3刘小林,肖湘生.磁共振相位对比电影方法对导水管脑脊液流动测量[J].中国医疗器械信息,1999,0(2):34-37. 被引量:2
  • 4刘晓林 罗志刚 宋历 等.磁共振相位对比方法测量导水管脑脊液流量.放射学实践,2003,18(2):120-122.
  • 5朱晓黎,沈天真,陈星荣.正常中脑导水管脑脊液流动磁共振定量研究[J].医学影像学杂志,2004,14(11):875-878. 被引量:19
  • 6姚伟武,陈星荣,沈天真.交通性脑积水脑室分流前后的脑脊液MRI定量研究[J].中国医学计算机成像杂志,2003,9(1):12-16. 被引量:9
  • 7Van Goethem JW, van den Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. JBR-BTR,2003 ,86 :340-344.
  • 8Buonocore MH. Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval. Magn Reson Med, 1993,29:790-795.

二级参考文献27

  • 1[1]Feinberg DA, Mark AS. Huaman brain motion and cerebrospinal fluid circulation demonstrated with MR velocity imaging. Radiology 1987; 163:793 ~ 799
  • 2[3]Bergsrand G, Bergstrom M, Nordell B, et al. Cardiac gated MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid flow. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 1003 ~ 1006
  • 3[4]Greitz D, Greitz T. The pathogenesis and hemodynamics of hydrocephalus: proposal for a new understanding. IJNR 1997; 3:367 ~ 375
  • 4[5]Greitz D, Wirestan R, Franck A, et al. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. Neuroradiology 1992; 34:370 ~ 380
  • 5[6]Bradeley WG, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void. Indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal pressuure hydrocephalus. Radiology 1991; 178:459 ~ 467
  • 6[7]Mascalchi M, Ciraolo L, Bucciolini M, et al. Fast multiphase MR imaging of aqueductal CSF flow: study in patients with hydrocephalus. AJNR 1990; 11: 597 ~ 603
  • 7[8]Nitz RG, Bradeley WG, Watanabe AS, et al. Flow dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid:assessment with phase - contrast velocity MR imaging performed with retrospective cardiac gating. Radiology 1992; 183:395 ~ 405
  • 8[9]Gideon P, Stahlberg F, Thomsen C, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and production in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus studied by MRI. Neuroradiology 1994; 36:210 ~ 215
  • 9[10]Bradeley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR imaging. Radiology 1996; 198:523 ~ 529
  • 10Bradley WG,Whittemort AR,Kortman KE,et al.Marked cerebrospinal fluid void:indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocphaluses[J].Radiology,1991,178:459.

共引文献26

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部