期刊文献+

3.0T MRI相位对比法对流体模型的定量测量研究 被引量:12

Study of quantitative measurement of a flow phantom by using phase-contrast MR imaging with 3.0T scanner
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:通过流体模型,检验3.0T磁共振相位对比法(3.0T PC-MRI)速度编码值(Venc)、编码方向的选择及其对流体动力学定量测量的准确性和稳定性。方法:固定流速和Venc,检验不同编码方向下的流体信息;固定Venc和编码方向,检验PC-MRI对不同注射流率(0-5 ml/s)所测流速值与标准流速的差别,采用配对样本t检验以检验二者差异性。结果:只有选择SLICE或SI编码方向才能正确反映质子流动的方向;在Venc适当大于实际流速时,不同注射流率PC-MRI流速测量值与流速真实值之间差异无统计学意义(t=-0.861,P〉0.05),二者呈显著正相关关系(r=0.999,P〈0.001)。结论:选择正确的Venc和编码方向是准确测量流体动力学的前提,3.0T PC-MRI能客观、准确地测量流体模型的动力学信息,可用于临床血流定量测量研究。 Objective:To investigate the selection of velocity encoding(Venc) and encoding direction with phase-contrast 3.0T MR imaging(3.0T PC-MRI) using a flow phantom,and to assess the accuracy and stability of the quantitative measurement of hydrokinetics.Methods:Firstly,holding the values of flow velocity and Venc,fluid dynamic information under different encoding directions were examined.Secondly,holding the values of Venc and encoding direction,the flow velocities measured by PC-MRI under different flow rates(0~5ml/s) were compared with standard flow velocities.Paired sample t test was employed to assess their statistical differences.Results:The direction of proton flow could only be correctly detected by selecting the encoding directions as SLICE or SI.Providing the value of Venc was appropriately greater than the actual flow velocity,no significant differences were existed between the measurements of flow velocity of PC-MRI with different flow rates and the corresponding actual flow velocities(t=-0.861,P=0.405),a significant positive correlation(r=0.999,P〈0.001) was existed.Conclusion:Selecting a correct values of Venc and encoding direction is the premise of accurate measurement of hydrokinetics,3.0T PC-MRI proved to be an accurate and objective technique in providing the dynamic information of the flow phantom study and could be used in the clinical quantitative study of blood flow.
出处 《放射学实践》 北大核心 2010年第5期474-477,共4页 Radiologic Practice
基金 广东省科技攻关基金资助项目(2006B36030026) 广州市科技攻关基金资助项目(2006Z3-E0241)
关键词 定量测量 磁共振成像 血液动力学 模型 结构 Quantitative measurement Magnetic resonance imaging Hemodynamics Models structural
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1de Haan MW,Kouwenhoven M,Kessels AG,et al.Renal artery blood flow:quantification with breath-hold or respiratory triggered phase-contrast MR imaging[J].Eur Radiol,2000,10(7):1133-1137.
  • 2Koskenvuo JW,Hartiala JJ,Knuuti J,et al.Assessing coronary sinus blood flow in patients with coronary artery disease:a comparison of phase-contrast MR imaging with positron emission tomography[J].AJR,2001,177(5):1161-1166.
  • 3Yildiz H,Erdogan C,Yalcin R,et al.Evaluation of communication between intracranial arachnoid cysts and cisterns with phase-contrast cine MR imaging[J].AJNR,2005,26(1):145-151.
  • 4Oktar SO,Yucel C,Karaosmanoglu D,et al.Blood-flow volume quantification in internal carotid and vertebral arteries:comparison of 3 different ultrasound techniques with phase-contrast MR imaging[J].AJNR,2006,27(2):363-369.
  • 5Pujadas S,Reddy GP,Weber O,et al.Phase contrast MR imaging to measure changes in collateral blood flow after stenting of recurrent aortic coarctation:initial experience[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2006,24(1):72-76.
  • 6Sankari S,Lehmann P,Gondry JC,et al.Phase-contrast MR imaging support for the diagnosis of aqueductal stenosis[J].AJNR,2009,30(1):209-214.
  • 7Pelc NJ,Herfkens RJ,Shimakawa A,et al.Phase contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging[J].Magn Reson Q,1991,7(4):229-254.
  • 8Greil G,Geva T,Maier SE,et al.Effect of acquisition parameters on the accuracy of velocity encoded cine magnetic resonance imaging blood flow measurements[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2002,15(1):47-54.
  • 9Lethimonnier F,Bouligand B,Thouveny F,et al.Error assessment due to coronary stents in flow-encoded phase contrast MR angiography:a phantom study[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,1999,10(5):899-902.
  • 10Arheden H,Saeed M,Tornqvist E,et al.Accuracy of segmented MR velocity mapping to measure small vessel pulsatile flow in a phantom simulating cardiac motion[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13(5):722-728.

二级参考文献19

  • 1Nayler DL, Firmin DN, Longmore DB. Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. J Comput Assist Tomogra 1986; 10:715 - 722
  • 2Meier D, Maier S, Bosiger P. Quantitative flow measurements on phantoms and on blood vessels with MR. Magn Reson Med 1988;8:25 - 34
  • 3Duerk JL, Pattany PM. In - plane flow velocity quantification along the phase encoding axis in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1988;6:321 - 333
  • 4Kondo C, Caputo GR, Semelka R, et al. Right and left ventricular stroke volume measurements with velocity - encoded cine MR imaging:in vitro and in vivo validation. A JR 1991;157:9 - 16
  • 5Heinrich M, Robert RE, Klaus UW, et al. Middle cerebral artery:determination of flow velocities with MR angiography. Radiology 1991; 181:527 - 530
  • 6Spritzer CE, Pelc NJ, Lee JN, et al. Rapid MR imaging of blood flow with a phase - sensitive, limited - flip - angle, gradient recalled pulse sequence: preliminary experience. Radiology 1990;176:255 - 262
  • 7Lorie R, Norbert J, Stephen C, et al. Arterial and venous blood flow: nonivaeive quantitation with MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:809 - 812
  • 8Peeters F, Luypaert R, Eisendrath H, et al. Time resolved flow quantification with MRI using phase methods: a linear systems approach. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:337- 354
  • 9Bernstein MA, Ikezaki Y. Comparison of phase - difference and complex - difference processing in phase - contrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1991; 10: 725- 729
  • 10Burkart DJ,Johnson CD,Morton MJ,et al.Volumetric flow rates in the portal venous system:measurement with cine phase-contrast MR imaging[J].AJR,1993,160(5):1113-1118.

共引文献10

同被引文献112

  • 1马晓海,张兆琪,李治安,何怡华,董莉,赵轶柯.相位对比磁共振技术测量冠状动脉血流的方法有效性研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(4):601-604. 被引量:9
  • 2雷晓燕,黄明刚,齐敏,张小玲,张鑫.心电图门控和周围门控技术相位对比脉冲序列扫描的对比分析[J].实用医学影像杂志,2005,6(2):67-68. 被引量:2
  • 3雷晓燕,沈亚梅,郭佑民,陈敏,杨健,徐桂平.肺动脉流速的MRI测量与多普勒超声比较研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2006,22(1):27-29. 被引量:5
  • 4Ascuitto R, Ross-Ascuitto N, Wiesman J, et al. Bidirectional Glenn shunt as an adjunct to surgical repair of congenital heart disease associated with pulmonary outflow obstruction: relevance of the fluid pressure drop-flow relationship. Pediatr Cardiol,2008,29:910-917.
  • 5Tanoue Y, Kado H, Boku N, et al. Three hundred and thirty- three experiences with the bidirectional Glenn procedure in a single institute. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg, 2007, 6: 97-101.
  • 6Beerbaum P, Barth P, Kropf S, et al. Cardiac function by MRI in congenital heart disease: impact of consensus training on interinstitutional variance. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009, 30 : 956-966.
  • 7Debl K, Djavidani B, Buchner S, et al. Quantification of left-to- right shunting in adult congenital heart disease: phase-contrast cine MRI compared with invasive oximetry. BrJ Radiol,2009,82: 386-391.
  • 8Korperich H, Gieseke J, Barth P, et al. Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study. Circulation ,2004,109 : 1987-1993.
  • 9Beerbaum P, K6rperich H, Barth P, et al. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase- contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation ,2001,103:2476-2482.
  • 10Day RW, Etheridge SP, Veasy LG, et al. Single ventricle palliation : greater risk of complications with the Fontan procedure than with the bidirectional Glenn procedure alone. Int J Cardiol, 2006,106:201-210.

引证文献12

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部