期刊文献+

TU M2-PK、TPS、CEA联合检测在肺癌中的临床价值 被引量:2

Clinical value of combined determination of TU M2-PK,TPS,CEA in the patients with lung cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨肺癌患者血清中TPS、CEA和血浆中TU M2-PK的临床应用价值。方法:采用ELISA法分别检测60例肺癌患者,54例良性肺部疾病和40例健康成人血清中TPS、CEA和血浆中TU M2-PK水平,并对28例肺癌患者进行术后1个月和3个月的随访检测。结果:肺癌组TU M2-PK、TPS、CEA水平明显高于良性肺疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.05)。3种肿瘤标志物单项检测时,TPS的敏感性(78.3%)最高,TU M2-PK的准确性(83.3%)最高;多项联合检测时,以TU M2-PK+TPS+CEA组合获得的敏感性(98.3%)和准确性(89.0%)最高,但特异性(83.0%)有所降低。3种肿瘤标志物水平随临床分期(TNM)增加而升高,Ⅰ、Ⅱ期和Ⅲ、Ⅳ期比较,TPS、CEA、TU M2-PK差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。手术治疗后,3种肿瘤标志物均较术前明显下降。结论:3种肿瘤标志物在肺癌的诊断治疗中,具有一定的临床应用价值。TU M2-PK+TPS+CEA组合可明显提高肺癌诊断的敏感性和准确性。 Objective:To investigate the clinical value of serum TPS,CEA and plasma TU M2-PK in lung cancer patients.Methods:The concentration of TPS,CEA and TU M2-PK were detected by ELISA in 60 lung cancer patients,54 benign lung disease patients and 40 healthy people.Moreover follow-up visit was undertaken at one month and three months after surgery for lung cancer patients.Results:The level of TPS,CEA and TU M2-PK were significantly higher in lung cancer than those in benign lung disease and health controls(P〈0.05).TPS showed the highest sensitivity(78.3%) and TU M2-PK showed the highest accuracy(83.8%) in single tumor marker detection,and TU M2-PK+TPS+CEA showed the highest sensitivity(98.3%) and accuracy(89.0%),but lower specificity(83.0%) in combined tumor marker detection for diagnosis of lung cancer.The level of TPS,CEA,TU M2-PK in stage Ⅲ and stage Ⅳ were evidently higher than those in stage I,Ⅱ.After operation,a marked decreasing in these values was observed.Conclusion:There was specifically clinical application value of these three tumor markers for diagnosis and cure of lung cancer.The sensitivity and accuracy can be increased with combination of TU M2-PK+TPS+CEA in diagnosis of lung cancer.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2011年第10期20-22,共3页 China Medical Herald
关键词 肿瘤标志物 肺肿瘤 组织多肽特异性抗原 癌胚抗原 肿瘤M2型丙酮酸激酶 Tumor marker Lung neoplasm TPS CEA TU M2-PK
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Weinberger R, Appel B, Stein A, et tO. The pyruvate kinase isoenzyme hi2 (Tu M2-PK) as a tumour marker for renal cell carcinoma [J]. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl),2007,16(4):333-337.
  • 2Hardt PD, Ewald N. Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase: a tumor marker and its clinical application in gastrointestinal malignancy [J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn,2008,8(5):579-585.
  • 3Mazurck S, Zwerschke W, Jansen Durr P, et al. Metabolic cooperation between different oncogenes dur/ng cell transfo~lnation: interaction be- tween activated ras HPV-16 E7 [J]. Oncoqene,2001,20(47):6891-6898.
  • 4Ventrucci M, Cipolla A, Racchini C, et al. Tumor M2-pyruvate kinase,a new metabolic marker for pancreatic cancer [J]. Dig Dis Sci,2004,49 (7-8):1149-1155.
  • 5黄薇,刘丽,吴倩,杨婷,谢汝佳,杨勤.人肺鳞状细胞癌中肿瘤M_2型丙酮酸激酶表达及临床意义的研究[J].肿瘤基础与临床,2009,22(1):5-7. 被引量:4
  • 6Chen F, Luo X, Zhang J, et al. Elevated serum levels of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 predict poor prognosis in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with gefitinib [J]. Med 0ncol,2010,27(3):950-957.
  • 7TU DG, Wang ST, Chang T'F, et al. The value of serum tissue polypep- tide specific antigen in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Cancer,1999,85(5):1039-1043.
  • 8Bjorklund B, Einarsson R. TPS (serum tissue polypeptide specific anti- gen) in oncologic practice: a review with reference to 300 cases of lung cancer [J]. Tumor Diagnosis and Therapy,1996,17(1):67-71.
  • 9Ando S, Kimura H, Iwai N, et al. Optimal combination seven tumor mark- ers in prediction of advanced stage at first examination of patients with non-small cell lung cancer [J]. Anticancer Res,2001,21(4B):3085-3092.
  • 10李学祥,周善良,王憨杰,韩彬彬,齐军.四项肿瘤标志联合检测在小细胞肺癌中的临床价值[J].中华检验医学杂志,2008,31(9):1011-1015. 被引量:20

二级参考文献17

  • 1赖百塘.肺癌基础研究的几个热点[J].中华医学信息导报,2004,19(3):12-12. 被引量:3
  • 2胡志东,王金良.一种新的肿瘤标志物TU M2-PK的研究进展[J].国外医学(临床生物化学与检验学分册),2005,26(3):162-164. 被引量:15
  • 3丁志祥,解东涯,杨春秀,秦建萍.血浆TU M_2-PK检测对肺癌的诊断价值[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(2):219-220. 被引量:6
  • 4厉明,梅同华.肺癌新标志——肿瘤M2型丙酮酸激酶[J].国际检验医学杂志,2006,27(5):446-447. 被引量:9
  • 5万文徽,李吉友.肿瘤标志的临床应用[J].中华医学检验杂志,1997,20(1):49-51. 被引量:180
  • 6Giovanella L, Ceriani L, Bandera M, et al. Evaluation of the serum markers CEA, NSE, TIcS and CYFRA 21. 1 in lung cancer. Int J Biol Markers, 1995,10:156-160.
  • 7Barak V, Goike H, Panaretakis KW, et al. Clinical utility of cytokeratins as tumor markers. Clin Biochem, 2004,37 : 529-540.
  • 8Buccheri G, Ferrigno D. Lung tumor markers of cytokeratin origin: an overview. Lung Cancer, 2001,34 Suppl 2:S65-69.
  • 9Lamy P, Grenier J, Kramer A, et al. Pro-gastrin-releasing peptide, neuron specific enolase and chromogranin A as serum markers of small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 2000,29: 197- 203.
  • 10Ebert W, Dienemann H, Fateh-Moghadam A, et al. Cytokeratin fragment CYFRA 21.1 compared with carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen and neuron-specific enolase in lung cancer: results of an international muhicentre study. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 1994,32:189-199.

共引文献71

同被引文献31

  • 1张新,周志祥.TUM_2-PK、NSE、CEA和CYFRA21-1联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床价值[J].航空航天医学杂志,2009,21(11):31-33. 被引量:1
  • 2丁志祥,解东涯,杨春秀,秦建萍.血浆TU M_2-PK检测对肺癌的诊断价值[J].第二军医大学学报,2006,27(2):219-220. 被引量:6
  • 3王东,周娟,刘敏,徐鸿绪.肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶在肺癌诊断中的应用[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(5):541-543. 被引量:5
  • 4Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al. Cancer statistics,2010 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010,60(5 ) : 277-300.
  • 5Mazurek S. Pyruvate kinase type M2:a key regulator of the metabolic tmdget system in tumor cells [J]. lnt J Biochem Cell Bio1,2011,43 (7): 969-980.
  • 6Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al. PRISMA Group: Preferred report- ing items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA state- ment [J]. Plos Med, 2009,6 : e 1000097.
  • 7Leeflang M M, Decks JJ.Gatsonis C ,et al. Cochrane Diagnostic Test Ac- curacy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy [J]. Ann Intern Med,2008,149 : 889-897.
  • 8Whiting PF,Weswood ME,Rutjes AW,et al. Evaluation of QUADAS,a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006,6:9.
  • 9Zamora J,Abraira V,Muriel A,et al. Meta-DiSc:a software for meta- analysis of test accuracy data [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2006,6:31.
  • 10Deeks JJ,Macaskill P,Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58 (9):882- 893.

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部