期刊文献+

三种内固定方法治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的比较 被引量:31

A comparison of three fixations for intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较股骨近端锁定加压钢板(LPFP)、亚洲型髋关节治疗系统(亚洲型IMHS)、Inter TAN治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的疗效。方法回顾性分析2008年2月至2009年12月收治并获得随访的185例老年股骨转子间骨折患者的临床资料,分别采用LPFP(A组,95例)、亚洲型IMHS(B组,52例)、InterTAN(C组,38例)治疗;比较3组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术中x线透视次数、住院费用、内固定失败例数及术后髋关节Harris功能评分。结果所有患者术后获6~28个月(平均14.5个月)随访。B、C组与A组比较,手术时间短、术中出血量少、内固定失败例数少,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。B、C组比A组术中x线透视次数多、住院费用高.差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。B、C两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术中x线透视次数、住院费用、内固定失败例数、Harris髋关节功能评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。B、c组与A组的Harris髋关节功能优良率比较,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论治疗老年股骨转子间骨折,亚洲型IMHS和InterTAN的疗效均优于LPFP,但亚洲型IMHS和InterTAN的疗效无明显差异。 Objective To compare the efficacy of 3 internal fixations, locking proximal femoral plate (LPFP), ASIAN IMHS and InterTAN, for intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients. Methods A retrospective study was done to analyse 185 elderly patients who had been treated for intertrochanteric femoral fractures from February 2008 to December 2009 in our hospital and fully followed up. They were treated with LPFP (group A, 95 cases), ASIAN IMHS (group B, 52 cases) and InterTAN (group C, 38 cases) . Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the 3 groups in operative time, blood loss, fluoroscopy exposure, hospital charges, intrraoperative complications and functional outcome (Harris hip score) . Results The average follow-up was 14. 5 months(from 6 to 28 months) . Compared with group A, groups B and C showed significant advantages in operative time, blood loss and functional outcome but significant disadvantages in fluoroscopy exposure and hospital charges ( P 〈 0. 05). Compared with group A, groups B and C had significant fewer implant failures ( P 〈 0.05). There were no significant differences in all the indexes between groups B and C( P 〉 0. 05) . Conclusions The ASIAN IMHS and InterTAN appear to be more reliable than LPFP for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly. There appear to be no significant differences between ASIAN IMHS and InterTAN.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2011年第2期130-134,共5页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 髋骨折 骨折固定术 内固定器 Hip fractures Fracture fixation, internal Internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bergeran E, Moore L, Fourier K, et al. Patients with isolated hip fracture must be considered for surgezy irrespectively of their age, eomorbidity status and provenance: a statement applicable even to nonagerians. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2009, 129: 1549-1555.
  • 2Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3, 279 fractures. Int Orthop, 2006, 30: 69-78.
  • 3危杰.股骨转子间骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(5):554-557. 被引量:112
  • 4熊圣仁,施毅,俞维川,张劲松,刘春水.AO股骨近端锁定加压钢板治疗股骨粗隆间骨折[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2010,25(4):343-344. 被引量:27
  • 5Makridis KG, Georgaklis V, Georgoussis M, et al. Comparing two intramedullary devices for treating trochanteric fractures: A prospective study. J Orthop Surg Res, 2010, 5: 9.
  • 6Osnes EK, Lofthus CM, Falch JA, et al. More postoperative femoral fractures with the Gamma nail than the sliding screw plate in the treatment of trochanteric fractures. Acts Orthop Scand, 2001, 72: 252-256.
  • 7Efstathopoulos NE, Nikolaou VS, Lazarettos JT. lntramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a comparison of two implant designs. Int Orthop, 2007, 31: 71-76.
  • 8汤欣,刘谟震,于利,刘长剑,赛大鹏,乔跃跃.新一代髓内钉InterTAN在股骨转子间骨折治疗中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2010,12(9):814-818. 被引量:58
  • 9Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, et al. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephaloeervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23: 22-30.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Pollak AN,Mc Carthy MI,Bess RS,et al.Outcomes after treatment of high-energy tibial plafond fractures.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2003,85 (10):1893.
  • 2Parker MJ,HandL1 HI-LGamma and other cephabcondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracap sular hip fractures in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2005,19(4) :93.
  • 3Bansal R,Luscombe J,Cooper JP.Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery.Injury,2004,35:114-120.
  • 4Jensen JS.Classification of trochanteric fractures.Acta Orthop Scand,1980,51:803-810.
  • 5Singh M,Nagrath AR,Maini PS.Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis.J Bone Joint Surg (Am),1970,52:457.
  • 6Ruecker AH,Rupprecht M,Gruber M,et al.The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures:results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression.J Orthop Trauma,2009,23:22-30.
  • 7Leung KS,So WS,Shen WY,et al.Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures.A randomised prospective study in elderly patients.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1992,74:345-351.
  • 8Baumgaertner MR,Solberg BD.Awareness of tip-apex distance reduces failure of fixation of trochanteric fracture of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1997,79:969-971.
  • 9Larsson S,Friberg S,Hansson L.Trochanteric fractures:Influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1990,(259):130-139.
  • 10Parker MJ.Cutting-out of the dynamic hip screw related to its position.J Bone Joint Surg(Br),1992,74:625.

共引文献191

同被引文献274

引证文献31

二级引证文献133

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部