期刊文献+

腹腔镜与输尿管镜手术治疗输尿管上段复杂性结石疗效比较 被引量:12

Comparison of efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in treating complex upper ureteral stones
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜切开输尿管取石术和经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石疗效。方法 67例复杂性输尿管上段结石患者,采用腹腔镜切开输尿管取石术和经尿道输尿管镜碎石术,分析比较两种手术方法的手术时间、术后住院时间、成功率、结石清除率。结果输尿管镜组、腹腔镜组的手术时间、术后住院时间分别为(92.58±39.64)vs(74.25±28.48)min、(5.32±2.28)vs(8.47±2.65)d,两组比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。输尿管镜组手术成功率和结石清除率分别为73.33%、76.67%,腹腔镜组为94.57%、100%,两组比较,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术比经尿道输尿管镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石安全有效。 【Objective】To compare the the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy (RPUL) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL) in the treatment of complex upper ureteral stones.【Methods】A total of 67 cases of the upper ureteral calculi, of them 37 cases undertaken RPUI and 30 cases URL. The mean operation time, average inhospital time, successful rate and stone clearance rate were measured and compared between the two groups.【Results】 Comparison between URL group and RPUL group included the following:mean operation time were (92.58±39.64) vs (74.25±28.48) min; average in-hospital time (5.32±2.28) vs (8.47±2.65) d. Significant differences were found between the two groups (P 0.05). The successful rate and stone clearance rate were 73.33%, 76.67% in URL group and 94.57%, 100% in RPUL group, there was significant difference between them (P 0.05).【Conclusion】RPUL is safer and more effective than URL in treating complex upper ureteral calculi.
出处 《中国内镜杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2010年第10期1072-1074,共3页 China Journal of Endoscopy
关键词 输尿管结石 腹腔镜 输尿管镜 ureteral calculi laparoscopy ureteroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献27

共引文献186

同被引文献69

  • 1郑珉,陈寅,陈轶欣,黄亚胜,虞旗旗.腹腔镜手术治疗鹿角形肾结石33例临床报告[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2011,35(5):691-693. 被引量:8
  • 2高健刚,夏溟.上尿路结石治疗方法的选择及进展[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(6):429-431. 被引量:46
  • 3孔东波,邹伟,王继文,赵克栋,饶志刚,涂晓辉.后腹腔镜肾盂切开取石术16例报告[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2007,22(4):302-303. 被引量:6
  • 4伍耿青,邹晓峰,袁源湖,等.经脐单孔腹腔镜(LESS)肾盂输尿管上段切开取石术14例报告[C]//中华医学会,中华医学会泌尿外科学分会.第十七届全国泌尿外科学术会议论文汇编.2010:94-95.
  • 5Bagley D,Erhard M.Use of the holmium laser in the upper urinary tract[J].Tech Urol, 1995, 1(1):25-30.
  • 6Elashry OM, Elgamasy AK, Sabaa MA,et al. Ureteroscopic man- agement of lower uretefic calculi: a 15-year single-centre expe- rience. BJU Int,2008,102(8) : t010-1017.
  • 7刘志军.腹腔镜背侧入路在输尿管手术中应用的解剐学及临床研究[J].河南医科大学学报,2010,3(15):9-11.
  • 8Castagnetti M, Rigamonti W. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for the treatment of urinary stones in children. Archhal Urol Androl, 2010, 82 (1) : 49 -50.
  • 9SUN YH, WANG LH, LIAO GQ, et al. The application of spiral-shaped double-J tube in the treatment of complicated ureteral stone extracorporeal shock wave application. Journal of Urology, 2002, 23 (6) .. 338-339.
  • 10AlanJWein.坎贝尔一沃尔什泌尿外科学9版郭应禄,周利群,主译.北京:北京夫学医学出版社,2009,1441-1470.

引证文献12

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部