摘要
【目的】探讨意象对话心理咨询技术中焦虑意象与SAS、HAMA的相关性。【方法】将139名来访者中出现焦虑意象者设为观察组，未出现焦虑意象者作为对照组，观察组中依据焦虑意象出现的次数分为4个焦虑意象因子组。观察组和对照组均采用焦虑自评量表（SAs）进行自评，汉密尔顿焦虑量表（HAMA）实施他评，根据SAS、HAMA得分进行差异性检验和相关分析。【结果】①对照组在SAS、HAMA上的得分明显低于观察组（t=-5．334，-4．821，P〈0．01）；②观察组内4个焦虑意象因子组在SAs、HAMA的得分上存在显著差异（F一19．061，15．083；P〈0．01）；③观察组在sAS、HAMA上的得分与焦虑意象因子数呈现显著正相关（r=0．588，0．544，P〈0．01）；基于SAS、HAMA标分的焦虑严重程度等级与焦虑意象因子数目呈正相关（r=0．539，0．537，P〈0．01）。【结论】意象对话心理咨询技术中焦虑意象与焦虑情绪有明显的相关关系，焦虑意象出现的次数与焦虑情绪呈正相关。
[Objective] To explore the correlation between anxious imagery in the Imagery Dialogue Psychological Counseling techniques and SAS, HAMA. [Methods]A total of 139 interviewers in psychological counseling were divided into control group （without anxious imagery） and observation group. The observation group was divided into 4 groups according to the occurrences of anxious imagery. Both of them were self-reported by SAS and observers-assessed by HAMA, and the test of significant difference and analysis of correla tion were done according to the scores of SAS and HAMA. [Results]①The SAS and HAMA scores of control group were significant lower than those of observation group（ t =- 5. 334,-4. 821, P 〈0.01）. ②In the observation group, there were significant differences in the SAS and HAMA scores among 4 anxious imagery groups（F=19. 061,15. 083 ; P 〈0.01）. ③In the observation group, there was significant positive correlation between the SAS and HAMA scores and the occurrences of anxious imagery（r = 0. 588,0. 544, P 〈0.01）. There was also significant positive correlation between the severe degree grouping of anxiety according to the SAS and HAMA scores and the occurrences of anxious imagery（r = 0. 539,0. 537, P 〈0. 01）. [Conclusion] Anxious imagery in the Imagery Dialogue Psychological Counseling techniques is significantly related to anxiety emotion, and the occurrences of anxious imagery are positively correlated with anxious emotion.
出处
《医学临床研究》
CAS
2009年第11期2054-2056,共3页
Journal of Clinical Research
关键词
心理学
医学
咨询
焦虑
psychology,medical
counseling
anxiety
