摘要
目的:检验意象对话诊断技术的有效性。方法:于2006-03随机抽取贵州省贵阳市某高校大二年级46名学生为调查对象。用SPSS11.0统计软件筛选出症状自评量表躯体化、强迫症状、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对、恐怖、偏执、精神病性9个因子得分的前10%与后10%的被试,比较两组被试在朱建军首创的意象对话中的镜中人测验、心房测验中的差异。结果:共发放问卷46份,收回有效问卷42份。镜中人测验可以测查症状自评量表中的躯体化程度,心房测验可以测查强迫症状、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、恐怖和精神病性6个因子,但对于敌对、偏执两因子无法做出很好的诊断。结论:意象对话诊断技术有着较高的效度,在心理诊断中可以尝试着运用。
AIM： To check the effectiveness of imagery conversing technique in the psychodiagnosis. METHODS： A total of 46 sophomores in the university of Guizhou ware selected in March 2006, and tested with symptom checklist （SCL-90） of 9 domains, including somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism. SPSS 11.0 software was adopted to choose the 10% top and 10% bottom scores of each factor, and two groups＇ differences in mirror test and heart-house test of imagery conversing, which was first invented by Zhu Jian-jun, ware compared. RESULTS： Totally 46 questionnaires ware sent out, and 42 valid ones ware taken back. Mirror test could diagnose the somatization of SCL-90, while heart-house test could reflect the levels of obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, anxiety, depression, phobic anxiety and psychoticism. However, the imagery conversing technique had no diagnostic value for hostility and paranoid ideation. CONCLUSION： Due to high validity, the imagery conversing technique can be applied in psychediagnosis.
出处
《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第30期6056-6058,共3页
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
