摘要
我国对于知识产权侵权案件采取的是行政保护和司法保护的双轨制,知识产权行政保护的关键是明确行政机关的处罚权限。著作权法、商标法和专利法采取了不同的知识产权侵权行政保护的立法模式,决定了不同行政管理部门的不同行政处罚权限。应修法解决双轨制所带来的行政保护和司法保护之间可能出现的矛盾关系,确立司法作为私权最后保护屏障的权威。
There are two ways to protect the legal rights of the intellectual property in China administratively and judicially. The administrative power must be clear and definite in order to avoid the abuse of power. Different legislation ways were adopted to limit the administrative power of solving IPRs disputes. The judicial resolutions should be regarded as the last and the best authoritative way to solve the IPRs disputes.
出处
《昆明理工大学学报（社会科学版）》
2009年第5期41-44,共4页
Journal of Kunming University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
广东省知识产权局委托项目<知识产权侵权行政执法权限研究>(2008-GDIPO-05)
关键词
知识产权侵权
行政保护
司法保护
IPRs torts
administrative protection
judicial protection
