摘要
现行法律和司法解释对专利重复侵权的规定较为笼统,尤其未明确“有改进仍侵权”(即侵权人改进技术方案后仍落入同一专利保护范围)是否构成重复侵权,进而可以适用惩罚性赔偿,导致司法实践中存在较大分歧。文章通过揭示其司法困境源于立法缺位,导致裁判分歧,分析行政规定的可适用性,以及商标法、刑法关于主客观要件认定规则的借鉴和启示,提出规则重构路径和制度完善建议。
Current laws and judicial interpretations in China provide rather general and vague stipulations regarding repeated patent infringement.A significant ambiguity lies in whether“infringement with modifications”(where an infringer modifies the technical solution,yet the modified solution still falls within the scope of protection of the same patent)constitutes repeated infringement,which could subsequently trigger the application of punitive damages.This lack of clarity has led to considerable divergence in judicial practice.This paper argues that this judicial dilemma stems from legislative gaps,which result in inconsistent adjudications,and it analyzes the potential applicability of administrative regulations and draws insights from the rules of the Trademark Law and the rules on the determination of subjective and objective elements in the Criminal Law.Finally,the study proposes pathways for reconstructing the legal rules and offers suggestions for improving the institutional framework.
作者
张亮
马嘉晟
ZHANG Liang;MA Jia-sheng(Unitalen Law Office of Beijing,Beijing 100004,China;School of Law,University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100102,China)
出处
《专利代理》
2025年第3期19-26,共8页
Patent Agency
关键词
FTO分析
有改进仍侵权
重复侵权
惩罚性赔偿
法律援助
FTO analysis
infringement with modifications
repeated infringement
punitive damages
legal aid
