期刊文献+

高中文理分科问题讨论应走向何方 被引量:1

Debate on Separation of the Subjects between Arts and Science in high school
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章认为,当前争论不休的中学文理分科问题反映出一定的简单思维。学生素质的全面提高涉及的是一个包括教育价值观、课程、教学以及考试等众多因素在内的系统改革。讨论要打破原有的思维定式,引导公众关注真正影响学生素质的因素。 The debate on the separation of the subjects between arts and science in high school shows a trend of being oversimplified. The all around development of the students relies on the comprehensive reform of educational ideology, curriculum, teaching and examination system. The debate should avoid be blindsided and focus on the factors influencing the all around development of the students.
出处 《考试研究》 2009年第2期27-36,共10页 Examinations Research
关键词 文理分科 思维定式 全面发展 Separation of the Subjects between Arts and Science fixed thought process all around development
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献13

  • 1王海东,张咏梅.美国大学入学考试(SAT)的发展历程及其对我国高考改革之启示[J].湖北招生考试,2007(16):60-63. 被引量:5
  • 2Camara,W.J,&Echternacht,G.(J).The SATI and high school grades:Utility in Predicting Success in College. Research Notes,RN-10 . 2000
  • 3Ramist,L,Lewis,C,&McCamley-Jenkins,L.Student group differences in predicting college grades:Sex,language and ethnic groups. College Board Research Report No.1993-1 .
  • 4Geiser,S,&Studley,R.UCandthe SAT:Predictive validity and differential impact of the SATI and SATII at the University of California[].Rethinking the SAT:The Future of Standardized Testingin University Admissions.2004
  • 5Goldman,R,&Widawki,M.A within-subjects technique for comparing college grading standards:Implications in the validity of the evaluation of college achievement[].Educational and Psychological Measurement.1976
  • 6Stiggins,R,Frsbie,D,&Griswold,P.Inside high school grading practice:Building a research agenda[].Educational Measurement.1989
  • 7Lohman,D.Aptitude for college:The importance of reasoning tests for minority admissions[].Rethinking the SAT:The Future of Standardized Testing in University Admissions.2004
  • 8Cattell,R.B.Intelligence:Its structure,growth,and action[]..1987
  • 9Cavanaugh,J.C,&Blanchard-Fields,F.Adult development and aging[]..2006
  • 10Noble,J,&Sawyer,R.Is high school GPAbetter than admissiontest scoresfor predicting academic success in college?[].College and University Journal.2004

同被引文献7

  • 1丁光莹,罗秋芳,抨击中国教育制度--朱永新呼吁取消文理分科[N],晶报,2008-11-02.
  • 2国家统计局人15和社会科技统计司,中国人口统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001.11.189.
  • 3尾家统计局人口和社会科技统计司,中国人口统计年鉴[M],北京:中国统计出版社,2001.11.217.
  • 4http://blog, sina. com. cn/s/blog_46ebbSbaOlOOc4o8. html? tj = 1.
  • 5蔡元培.就任北京大学校长之演说[A].蔡元培全集第二卷[M].中华书局,1984.283.
  • 6张亚群,刘毳.高中取消文理分科为时尚早[J].考试研究,2009,5(2):4-13. 被引量:14
  • 7康翠萍.高中阶段不宜实行文理分科[J].教育研究,2009,30(4):40-42. 被引量:27

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部