摘要
目的:探讨人群中焦虑或抑郁状态下的亚健康与非亚健康状态者之间的应对方面的异同。方法:采用医院用焦虑抑郁量表以及应付方式问卷,定≥8分为焦虑或抑郁状态,<8分为非焦虑或非抑郁状态,所有数据均进行z检验。结果:无论是在焦虑状态,还是在抑郁状态下亚健康(研究)组与非亚健康(对照)组的应付方式均有不同程度差异,经比较有统计学意义(P<0.05,P<0.001),具体应付过程除了"自信心的"或"支持倾向"外,其余也均有统计学差异,对男性或女性的具体应付过程的影响也不尽相同;然而在焦虑或抑郁状态下研究组或对照组的男女之间应对比较均无显著差异。结论:人群中焦虑或抑郁状态下的亚健康与非亚健康状态者之间的应对方面的存在显著差异,焦虑或抑郁状态下对亚健康状态组具体应付过程选择有影响;然而在性别之间无统计学差异,无论是亚健康状态,还是"非亚健康人"均处于不良的应对中,临床心理治疗应区别对待。
Objective： To investigate the coping style between the subheahh （study group,SG） and non-subheahh status （control group,CS） under anxious or depressive status. Methods： All were evalued in the hospital anxiety and depression scale （HAD） and coping style questionnaire （CSQ）. And it was ≥ 8 scores as the depressive or anxious state in this study. The data was analyzed in ＂z＂ test. Results： Under the anxious or depressive status,the scores of coping style were signifi cantly diference between SG and CS（P〈0.05-0.001 ）, there were remarkably statistical significance,besides the score of the Assertion or Support orientation in the coping process,and those effects on the coping coures of the male or female were not alike. However,there was not marked distinction between the men and women. Conclusion： There was significance of coping of the citizens between the subheahh and non-subhealth status of the anxious or depressive status, meanwhile there were the selective effects on concrete coping progress of the subhealth status group in the anxios or depressive status, but there was no significance on scores in coping between the gender of SG or CS. It should be dealed with each case on its merits in clinically practice.
出处
《中国当代医药》
2009年第5期27-29,共3页
China Modern Medicine
关键词
亚健康状态
抑郁
焦虑
应付方式
Subhealth statusnon-subhealth status
Anxiety
Depression
Coping style
