摘要
目的 :探讨有无焦虑症状抑郁症患者的应付方式与人格的关系。方法 :对 88名抑郁症患者及与之匹配的 90名正常对照组进行SDS、SAS、EPQ和应付方式问卷评定。结果 :与正常对照组相比 ,抑郁症患者SDS、SAS、EPQ的N、P两个维度的得分高于正常对照组 ,而EPQ的E维度、积极应付方式得分低于对照组。相对于无焦虑症状组 ,有焦虑症状组SDS、SAS、EPQ的N、P两个维度的得分明显较高 ,积极应付方式得分明显较低。相关、回归分析表明抑郁症状的严重程度与SAS、EPQ的E维度及积极应付方式的关系更为密切 ,三者可解释抑郁症状严重程度方差的 5 2 0 %。结论 :抑郁症患者发病期有较高的N、P两个维度的得分 ,较低的E维度得分 ,较少采用积极的应付方式。相对于无焦虑症状组 ,有焦虑症状组的抑郁症患者抑郁症状较严重 ,神经质、精神质比较明显 ,较少采用积极的应付方式。且较少采用积极的应付方式似乎可纳入人格特质的E维度之中。
Objective:To explore the relation among depression, anxiety, coping styles and personality in patients with major depression.Method:88 patients with major depression were assessed on admission. The assessments included Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Coping Styles Questionnaire. Nighty normal controls were assessed with the same instruments too.Results:The patients were found having higher scores in Neuroticism and Psychoticism, and lower scores in Extroversion and positive coping styles than normal controls.Higher scores in SDS, SAS, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism, and lower scores in positive coping styles, were found in the patients with anxiety. Significant relationship was found among depression, SAS, Extroversion, and positive coping styles.The last three accounted for 52.0% of the variance of depression.Conclusion:The patients with major depression have high scores in Neuroticism and Psychoticism, and low in Extroversion and positive coping styles.Those with anxiety scored even higher in SDS, SAS, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism, and lower in positive coping styles.The application of little positwe coping styles moy be a part of Extrovision in major depresion.
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2003年第12期843-845,共3页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金
广东省教育科学规划项目
批准号 (GYA0 2 0 39)
北京市重点实验室--首都师范大学<学习与认知实验室>经费资助
关键词
抑郁症
焦虑症状
应付方式
人格
相关研究
精神病学
psychiatry major depression case-conrol studies anxiety coping styles personality
