摘要
目的：探讨亚健康状态在焦虑或抑郁与非焦虑或非抑郁状态下之间的应对方面的异同。方法：采用医院用焦虑抑郁量表以及应付方式问卷,以≥8分为焦虑或抑郁状态,与〈8分为非焦虑或非抑郁状态进行分组z检验。结果：亚健康状态者在焦虑或抑郁与非焦虑或非抑郁状态下的应付方式差异有显著性（P〈0.001）,其具体应付过程方面除了＂自我控制＂或＂敏感化的＂外,余均有不同程度的显著差异（P〈0.001~0.009）。结论：无论是焦虑状态,还是抑郁状态下均对亚健康状态的应对有影响,特别是对情绪缓冲性应付方式作用与其他报道不同,其机制有待阐明。
Objective：To investigate the coping style of sub health status between the anxious or depressive and non-anxious or non-depressive status.Methods：All cases were valued in the hospital anxiety and depression scale（HAD） and coping style questionnaire（CS）.And it was ≥8 scores as the depressive or anxious state in this study.The data was analyzed in ＂z＂ test.Results： The scores of problem-oriented coping style or affective palliative coping style（PO-CS or AP-CS） were significantly lower between the anxious and non-anxious group or between the depressive and non-depressive groups;however,there was only no significance of scores of the Repression or Sensitization in coping progress.Conclusions： There was all remarked significance of coping in the patients between the anxious and non-anxious state and the depressive and non-depressive state, Moreover,the depressive or anxious emotion affected on the some of coping behavior,the mechanism will be observed.
出处
《中国民康医学》
2008年第23期2744-2745,2761,共3页
Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词
亚健康状态
抑郁
焦虑
应付方式
Sub health status
Anxiety
Depression： Coping style
