期刊文献+

“美国对华铜版纸案”述评--基于反补贴申诉的考察 被引量:8

原文传递
导出
摘要 美国新页纸业集团基于中国政府为促进国内造纸业发展而制定的政策性贷款计划、税收减免优惠措施等向美国商务部提起了针对原产于中国铜版纸的反补贴申诉,美国商务部也一反不对"非市场经济国家"适用反补贴法的做法,作出了对原产于中国的铜版纸征收反补贴税的终裁裁决。"美国对华铜版纸案"启示我们,在WTO法律体系下我国现行的补贴政策还有待调整和转换,税收和银行法律制度还有待完善。
作者 李仲平 李炼
机构地区 广东金融学院
出处 《法商研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第1期3-9,共7页 Studies in Law and Business
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Determination of the Less- Than- Fair- Value Investigation of Coated Free Sheet Paper from the Republic of China ,October 17, 2007.
  • 2The Commission's Public Report Coated Free Sheet Paper from China, Indonesia, and Korea ,Investigation Nos. 701-TA-444 -446 and 731-TA- 1105- 1107 (Final), USITC Publication 3965, November 2007.
  • 3步欣.《中国企业反对美方对我国钢铁产品发起“两反”调查》,《国际商报》2007年7月2日.
  • 4《美国对中国产品发起第七起双反调查中国强烈反对》,http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/cede/chn/ssxw/t380680.htm.
  • 5DynamicRandom Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea j Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 72 Fed. Reg. 7015(February 14, 2007), and Accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, at 6.
  • 6Preamble, 63 Fed. Reg. 65363.
  • 7Department of Commerce: Coated Free Sheet Paper from the People's Republic of China: Amended Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,72 Fed. Reg. 17484 (April 9, 2007).
  • 8沈乐平.论母子公司与交叉持股的法律问题[J].社会科学研究,2004(3):73-77. 被引量:19
  • 9Fabrique de Fer de Charleroi v. United States, 166 F. Supp. 2d. 593, 604 (CIT 2001).
  • 10Notice of Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Countervailing Duty Determination with Final Antidumping Duty Determination: Certain Cold-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat products From the Republic of Korea, 67 FR 9685, 9683 (March 4, 2002) .

二级参考文献5

共引文献18

同被引文献71

  • 1龚柏华,倪洁颖.中美有关铜版纸征收反倾销和反补贴税WTO磋商案评析[J].国际商务研究,2007,28(6):49-54. 被引量:13
  • 2陈立虎,赵艳敏.美国对中国产品并用反倾销反补贴措施问题研究[J].安徽警官职业学院学报,2007,6(6):7-13. 被引量:10
  • 3江帆.浅谈服务贸易反补贴制度[J].广州市经济管理干部学院学报,2005,7(3):34-37. 被引量:2
  • 4WTO: Questions Relevant to the Information Exchange Required under the Subsidies Negotiation Mandate, Note by the Secretariat, S/WPGR/W/16, February 1997.
  • 5WTO Working Party on GATS Rules: Communication from Chile, Hong Kong, China, Mexico, Peru and Switzerland-Proposal for a Provisional Definition of Subsidies in Services, JOB (05) /96.
  • 6http://www.wtocenter.org.tw/SmartKMS/do/www/readDoc? document_id=84973&action=content.
  • 7WTO working party on GATS Rules : Subsidies for Services Sectors - Information Contained in WTO Trade Policy Reviews, Background Note by the Secretariat, S/WPGR/W/25, and Add. 1 to Add.5.
  • 8WTO working party on GATS Rules: Subsidies for Services Sectors - Information Contained in WTO Trade Policy Reviews, Background Note by the Secretariat, S/WPGR/W/25/Add.5.
  • 9杨光华.服务补贴规范发展必要性之初探.政大法学评论,2004,(5).
  • 10Rudolf Adlung. (2007) "Negotiation on Safeguards and Subsidies in Services: A Never-ending Story," Journal of International Economic Law 245.

引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部