期刊文献+

反补贴申诉的贸易转移效应--基于面板数据的实证分析 被引量:5

Trade Diversion Effect of Countervailing Initiation:Empirical Analysis Based on Panel Data
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用1991-2009年的统计数据,以1993-2007年间立案的188起国际反补贴案件6位税则号的涉案产品数据为研究对象,通过建立动态面板数据模型,实证分析反补贴申诉的贸易转移效应。结果表明:反补贴申诉会导致涉案产品的进口从被诉国转移到非被诉国,其中墨西哥、美国、欧盟和其他国家的贸易转移效应较大;相比无税结案,征税结案的情况下产生的贸易转移效应更大,即对被诉国的出口的损害更大。 Using a data set based on 6 digital tariff codes identified in 188 global countervailing cases initiated from 1993 to 2007,and covering the latest statistical data from 1991 to 2009,trade diversion effect of countervailing initiation is examined by establishing a dynamic panel data model.Empirical test shows that countervailing initiation diverts imports from named countries to non-named countries and has the most significant trade diversion effects on Mexico,followed by USA,EU and other countries.Compared with negative decisions,affirmative decisions generate greater trade diversion effects with more damage to export of named countries.
作者 孙铭 杨仕辉
出处 《财贸研究》 CSSCI 2011年第5期65-70,共6页 Finance and Trade Research
关键词 反补贴申诉 贸易转移效应 面板数据 countervailing initiation trade diversion effect panel data
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1ARELLANO M, BOND S R. 1992. Some tests of specification for panel data: monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equa- tions[J]. Review of Economics Studies, 58 (2) :277 - 297.
  • 2BOWN P, CROWLEY A. 2007. Trade deflection and trade depression [J]. Journal of International Economics, 72( 1 ) :176 -201.
  • 3BRENTON P. 2001. Anti - dumping policies in the EU and trade diversion [ J ]. European Journal of Political Economy, 17 (3) :593 - 607.
  • 4HERRMANN M L, LIN B, MITTELHAMMER R C. 2006. Effects of countervailing duty on Norwegian farmed salmon[J]. Agriculture Busi- ness, 4(7) :339 -355.
  • 5JONES K, HARVEY D J. 2006. Evaluating the economic impact of countervailing duties on United States warm water shrimp imports [ C ]. The American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, California:23 -26.
  • 6NIELS G, TEN K A. 2006. Antidumping policy in developing countries : safety valve or obstacle to free trade [ J]. European Journal of Polit- ical Economy, 22(3) :618 -638.
  • 7PARK S. 2009. The trade depressing and trade diversion effects of antidumping actions: the case of China [ J ]. China Economic Review, 20 (3) :542-548.
  • 8PRUSA T J. 1999. On the spread and impact of antidumping [ R]. NBER Working Paper,No. 7404.

同被引文献80

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部