期刊文献+

基于rDNA ITS-1序列酿酒酵母的系统分类学研究 被引量:6

Phylogenetic reclassification analysis of S. cerevisiae based on the internal transcribed spacer 1(ITS-1) sequence of rDNA
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了准确快速地为酵母生产提供优良菌株,采用核糖体DNA ITS-1(Internal transcribed spacer 1)序列分析法,对27株酵母菌(其中24株为酿酒酵母属中的酿酒酵母(S.cerevisiae),其他3株分别为汉逊酵母属中的多形酵母(H.polymorph)、克鲁维酵母属中的乳清酵母(K.marxianus)和红酵母属中的粘质酵母(R.mucilaginosa))进行了系统分类学研究,提取这27株酵母菌的基因组DNA并进行PCR扩增,采用琼脂糖和非变性聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳检测,能将酵母菌株鉴定到属的水平;对PCR扩增序列进行克隆和测序,结果表明大多数酿酒酵母菌株之间的ITS-1序列有差异,主要表现在序列中的一段Ploy-T上,最少的有7个T,最多的有13个T。研究还用Phylip 3.6等DNA序列分析软件对不同ITS-1序列的菌株进行了系统发育分析,确定出不同菌株之间的亲缘关系,并纠正了长期认为是酿酒酵母的两株酵母菌。 In order to supply high quality yeast strains rapidly and exactly in production,the number of 27 yeast strains are researched by analyzing phylogenetic position,24 yeast strains of which are S.cerevisiae,the others are H.polymorph,K.marxianus and R.mucilaginosa respectively.The internal transcribed spacer sequences 1,part of 18S rDNA and 5S rDNA of yeast strains are amplified by PCR after DNA isolation and primer design.The strains between genus can be identified by AGE,and part of species can be identified by PAGE.By cloning and sequencing of the ITS-1 sequences,there are differences between many S.cerevisiae,except that few of them are same completely.The most diversity are series of sequences of Poly-T between 7 and 13.The taxonomic relationships between them are indicated by Phylip 3.6 with the different ITS-1 sequences of S.cerevisiae strains.
出处 《西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版)》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期191-195,共5页 Journal of Northwest A&F University(Natural Science Edition)
关键词 ITS-1序列 酿酒酵母菌 系统发育分析 ITS-1 sequence S.cerevisiae phylogenetic position
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献76

  • 1李明霞,唐荣观.不同类群酵母胞壁甘露聚糖核磁共振氢谱的比较研究[J].真菌学报,1989,8(4):296-303. 被引量:5
  • 2刘钢,周与良.真菌分类技术的进展[J].微生物学通报,1995,22(6):362-365. 被引量:23
  • 3白逢彦,贾建华.克鲁斯假丝酵母及其近似种的脉冲电泳核型分析[J].微生物学报,1996,36(5):329-334. 被引量:16
  • 4[1]Bai FY, 1996. Separation of Candida fermentati comb. nov. from Candida guilliermondii by DNA base composition and electrophoretic karyotyping. Syst Appl Microbiol 19:178~181
  • 5[2]Bai FY, Liang HY, Jia JH, 2000. Taxonomic relationships among the taxa in the Candida guilliermondii complex, as revealed by comparative electrophoretic karyotyping. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50: 417~422
  • 6[3]Barnett JA, 1968. Biochemical differentiation of taxa with special reference to the yeasts. In Ainsworth GC and Sussman AS (eds.), The Fungi, An Advanced Treatise. Volume III, the Fungal Population. New York, Academic Press, .557~595
  • 7[4]Buckley HR, van Uden N, 1968. Five new Candida species. Mycopathol Mycol Appl 36: 257~266
  • 8[5]Felsenstein J, 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783~791
  • 9[6]Kurtzman CP, 1998. Pichia E.C. Hansen emend. Kurtzman. In Kurtzman C P and Fell JW (eds.), The Yeasts, A Taxonomic Study, 4th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 273~352
  • 10[7]Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ, 1997. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in 5' end of the large~subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J Clin Microbiol 35: 1216~1223

共引文献157

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部