期刊文献+

舒普深对烧伤创面多元耐药菌株的抗菌活性 被引量:7

In vitro antibacterial activity of sulperazone on multi-resistant strains of bacteria from burn wounds
原文传递
导出
摘要 舒普深(SLP)是一种β-内本义酶抑制剂青霉烷砜与头孢哌酮(CFP)配伍组成的新型抗生素。作者测定了SLP对烧伤创面多元耐药菌株的敏感性。结果显示,革兰氏阴性杆菌对SLP与CFP的敏感率分别为77.3%(n=163)和45.0%(n=169)(P<0.01)。其中硝酸盐阴性杆菌与绿脓杆菌对SLP的敏感性分别高达100%及88.9%;肠杆菌科细菌对SLP的敏感率(70.1%,n=10)亦高于CFP(38.4%,n=112)(P<0.01)。革兰氏阳性球菌对SLP与CFP的敏感率分别为37.5%(n=128)和24.6%(n=126,P<0.05)。其中最为常见的金黄色葡萄球菌对SLP与CFP的敏感率分别为42.6%(n=61)和21.3%(n=61)。这表明,青霉烷砜可有效抑制常见病原菌产生的β-内酰胺酶,使抗生素呈现良好的抗菌活性而恢复耐药菌株的敏感性。 AbstractSulperazone(SLP),a combination of sulbactam(β-lactamase inhibitor)with cefoperazone(CFP),wasstudied in vitro for its sensitivitv to multi-resistant strains of bacterhia isolated from burn wounds. The re-sults showed that the sensitive rate of gram-negativebacteria to SLP was 77. 3%(n=163),higher than thatof CFP(45.0%,n=169)(P< 0. 01).The rate ofpseudomonas aeruginosa which was common among thegram-negative bacteria was 88.9%(n=45),much high-er than that of CFP(71.7%,n=46)(P<0.05);Therate of bacterium anitratum was 100%, and it was re-sistant to CFP (P<0.01 ).The sensitive rate of gram-positive bacteria to SLP was 37. 5%(n=128) but toCFP was 24.6%(n=126)(P<0.05). The rate ofstaphylococcus aureus which was common in gram-pos-itive bacteria was 42.6%(n=61), much higher thanthat of CFP (21.3%,n=61)(P<0.05).It is indicatedthat sulbactam inhibits most β-lactamases produced bycommon bacterial pathogens and makes antibiotics re-store the sensitivity to resistant strains. Sulperazone ispromising in the treatment of burn infection.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1995年第7期390-392,共3页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1Norrby S R,美国医学会杂志(中文版),1993年,12卷,增刊,2页
  • 2许伟石,中国抗生素杂志,1992年,17卷,281页

同被引文献24

引证文献7

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部