摘要
土地对农民有多重效用,若以土地对农民的总效用为1,则土地对农民的基本生活保障效用、就业机会效用、直接经济效益效用、子女继承效用、征地后可以得到补偿效用、以免重新获取时支付大笔费用效用的平均值依次分别为0.3425、0.1236、0.2104、0.0458、0.2661、0.0117。显著影响上海市土地对农民基本生活保障效用的因素有性别、文化程度、职业、从农村转移到城市的意愿等,文章运用多元线性回归的模型定量分析了以上因素对土地的基本生活保障效用的影响。文章也同时印证了Scott有关小规模土地下农民决策基于生存伦理的结论,最后也提出了从土地保障向社会保险转换的优先人群选择的建议。
The effectiveness of rural collective land to farmers is multiplicate,namely, the effectiveness of giving farmers basic life security,providing job opportunities,supplying direct income,endowing farmers' children the right of succession,paying compensatory based on requisition by government purchase,and preventing farmers from paying too much money to regain collective land after aborting it. Let the whole effectiveness for rural collective land to a farmer is one, then the six pieces of effectiveness in order are 0.3425、0.1236、0.2104、0.0458、0.2661、0.0117. The factors obviously affecting the basiclifesecurity effectiveness of land to farmers are sex, education level, occupation,willingness to move from a rural area to an urban area, etc, which is proved by multiregress model. It also proves that Scott's conclusion that the decision farmers with small scale land make is based on survival ethics. And it finally gives some advice on how to choose the people to carry out the transition policy from land security to social security.
出处
《上海财经大学学报》
2004年第6期10-17,共8页
Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
基金
国家自然科学基金<中国农村集体土地资产化运作与农村社会保障机制建设研究>(70341011)
上海市社会科学基金<上海郊区集体土地价格形成机制实证研究>(2003BJB007)
<发展市场经济与农村劳动力转移研究>(2004XAB003)等课题的阶段性成果之一。
