摘要
民国初年,围绕正在构建的行政诉讼体制应采取何种模式,一批学者、政客曾展开激烈争论。争论主要涉及三个层面内容,即法理上行政审判权的性质与归属、体制上行政审判机关与行政机关之间是“一元制”还是“二元制”、传统都察院的去留。争论不但影响了民国初年的行政立法,还使当时行政体制的构建与完善过程进一步复杂化。究其原因,争论既是学理争论和辩异的结果,又是各种政治势力角逐的必然。
In the early years of ROC(Republic of China),a group of scholars and politicians had a fierce debate on which model administrative litigation system should use.The debate mainly focused on three levels,which included what the nature and relegation of administrative adjudgment authority was in terms of legal principle;whether the system between adjudgment body and administration body were “single model” or “dual model”;how to deal with traditional supervisory institution.The debate had affected the administr...
出处
《社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期97-104,共8页
Journal of Social Sciences
基金
2006年上海市哲学社会科学基金资助项目:<清代的法律控制与社会控制研究>
项目编号:2006BFX010
关键词
民国
行政诉讼
争论
ROC
Administrative Litigation
Debate
