Studying the coupling coordination development of new energy vehicles(NEVs)and the ecological environment in China is helpful in promoting the development of NEVs in the country and is of great significance in promoti...Studying the coupling coordination development of new energy vehicles(NEVs)and the ecological environment in China is helpful in promoting the development of NEVs in the country and is of great significance in promoting high-quality development of new energy in China.This paper constructs an evaluation index system for the development of NEVs and the ecological environment.It uses game theory combining weighting model,particle swarm optimized projection tracking evaluation model,coupling coordination degree model,and machine learning algorithms to calculate and analyze the level of coupling coordination development of NEVs and the ecological environment in China from 2010 to 2021,and identifies the driving factors.The research results show that:(i)From 2010 to 2021,the development index of NEVs in China has steadily increased from 0.085 to 0.634,while the ecological environment level index significantly rose from 0.170 to 0.884,reflecting the continuous development of China in both NEVs and the ecological environment.(ii)From 2010 to 2012,the two systems—new energy vehicle(NEV)development and the ecological environment—were in a period of imbalance and decline.From 2013 to 2016,they underwent a transition period,and from 2017 to 2021,they entered a period of coordinated development showing a trend of benign and continuous improvement.By 2021,they reached a good level of coordination.(iii)Indicators such as the number of patents granted for NEVs,water consumption per unit of GDP,and energy consumption per unit of GDP are the main driving factors affecting the coupling coordination development of NEVs and the ecological environment in China.展开更多
New energy vehicle is driving Anhui’s manufacturing transformation.ANHUI Province’s automobile and new energy vehicle(NEV)production output both leapt to first place in China in the first quarter of 2025,and its aut...New energy vehicle is driving Anhui’s manufacturing transformation.ANHUI Province’s automobile and new energy vehicle(NEV)production output both leapt to first place in China in the first quarter of 2025,and its automobile exports also ranked first nationwide.For every eight vehicles produced in the country,there is one“made in Anhui,”while one out of every four vehicles exported comes from the province.展开更多
近期工信部等部门规定了CAFC(Corporate Average Fuel Consumption)和NEV(New Energy Vehicle)两套积分的考核办法,对国内乘用车企业同时提出了油耗要求和新能源汽车生产比例要求。在此要求下,如何规划产品战略才能合规生产是国内车企...近期工信部等部门规定了CAFC(Corporate Average Fuel Consumption)和NEV(New Energy Vehicle)两套积分的考核办法,对国内乘用车企业同时提出了油耗要求和新能源汽车生产比例要求。在此要求下,如何规划产品战略才能合规生产是国内车企最关注的问题。针对这一问题,在解读考核办法的核心要求、对中国积分现状分析的基础上,综合国内外车企新能源产品布局最新动态,对国内车企的新能源产品战略提出了建议。展开更多
中国新能源汽车行业能否成功,颠覆性创新对于助推绿色经济转型和实现可持续发展具有重大示范作用,而颠覆性创新的非连续性、突变性给中国车企带来巨大挑战。本文选择比亚迪、特斯拉与丰田3家具有代表性的新能源汽车(New Energy Vehicles...中国新能源汽车行业能否成功,颠覆性创新对于助推绿色经济转型和实现可持续发展具有重大示范作用,而颠覆性创新的非连续性、突变性给中国车企带来巨大挑战。本文选择比亚迪、特斯拉与丰田3家具有代表性的新能源汽车(New Energy Vehicles,NEV)企业作为分析对象,从初始目标市场选择、技术路径、市场扩散路径以及实现路径等维度总结案例企业开展颠覆性创新的实践经验,凝练出3种不同的颠覆性创新模式,并剖析3种模式的关键要素。研究发现:比亚迪采取环境支持性的颠覆性创新模式,而特斯拉采取的是跨界融合式的颠覆性创新模式,丰田则采取协同创新型颠覆性创新模式。三种颠覆性创新模式分别基于不同的着眼点进行构建,受到不同类型的机会窗口的驱动,后续将遵循不同的竞争演化路径,同时面临不同的演化障碍。同一行业当中可能同时出现多种不同的颠覆性创新模式。展开更多
基金Supported by the Postgraduate Research&Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province(KYCX24_0102)the China Scholarship Council Program(202406190114)。
文摘Studying the coupling coordination development of new energy vehicles(NEVs)and the ecological environment in China is helpful in promoting the development of NEVs in the country and is of great significance in promoting high-quality development of new energy in China.This paper constructs an evaluation index system for the development of NEVs and the ecological environment.It uses game theory combining weighting model,particle swarm optimized projection tracking evaluation model,coupling coordination degree model,and machine learning algorithms to calculate and analyze the level of coupling coordination development of NEVs and the ecological environment in China from 2010 to 2021,and identifies the driving factors.The research results show that:(i)From 2010 to 2021,the development index of NEVs in China has steadily increased from 0.085 to 0.634,while the ecological environment level index significantly rose from 0.170 to 0.884,reflecting the continuous development of China in both NEVs and the ecological environment.(ii)From 2010 to 2012,the two systems—new energy vehicle(NEV)development and the ecological environment—were in a period of imbalance and decline.From 2013 to 2016,they underwent a transition period,and from 2017 to 2021,they entered a period of coordinated development showing a trend of benign and continuous improvement.By 2021,they reached a good level of coordination.(iii)Indicators such as the number of patents granted for NEVs,water consumption per unit of GDP,and energy consumption per unit of GDP are the main driving factors affecting the coupling coordination development of NEVs and the ecological environment in China.
文摘New energy vehicle is driving Anhui’s manufacturing transformation.ANHUI Province’s automobile and new energy vehicle(NEV)production output both leapt to first place in China in the first quarter of 2025,and its automobile exports also ranked first nationwide.For every eight vehicles produced in the country,there is one“made in Anhui,”while one out of every four vehicles exported comes from the province.
文摘近期工信部等部门规定了CAFC(Corporate Average Fuel Consumption)和NEV(New Energy Vehicle)两套积分的考核办法,对国内乘用车企业同时提出了油耗要求和新能源汽车生产比例要求。在此要求下,如何规划产品战略才能合规生产是国内车企最关注的问题。针对这一问题,在解读考核办法的核心要求、对中国积分现状分析的基础上,综合国内外车企新能源产品布局最新动态,对国内车企的新能源产品战略提出了建议。
文摘中国新能源汽车行业能否成功,颠覆性创新对于助推绿色经济转型和实现可持续发展具有重大示范作用,而颠覆性创新的非连续性、突变性给中国车企带来巨大挑战。本文选择比亚迪、特斯拉与丰田3家具有代表性的新能源汽车(New Energy Vehicles,NEV)企业作为分析对象,从初始目标市场选择、技术路径、市场扩散路径以及实现路径等维度总结案例企业开展颠覆性创新的实践经验,凝练出3种不同的颠覆性创新模式,并剖析3种模式的关键要素。研究发现:比亚迪采取环境支持性的颠覆性创新模式,而特斯拉采取的是跨界融合式的颠覆性创新模式,丰田则采取协同创新型颠覆性创新模式。三种颠覆性创新模式分别基于不同的着眼点进行构建,受到不同类型的机会窗口的驱动,后续将遵循不同的竞争演化路径,同时面临不同的演化障碍。同一行业当中可能同时出现多种不同的颠覆性创新模式。
