期刊文献+

对消除学生评价教师负面影响的思考 被引量:15

A Consideration on Eliminating Negative Influences of Students' Evaluation of Teachers
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文分析了高等学校学生评价教师活动容易产生负面影响的四个主要原因。借鉴国内外大学的一些实践经验,指出要做好学生评价教师工作,必须把握评价活动的方向性,提高评价活动的科学性,增强评价活动的可操作性以及确保评价活动的可接受性。 This paper makes an analysis of the four main reasons why college students' assessments of their teachers tend to produce some negative influences. Referring to some practical experience of universities at home and abroad, we must grasp the direction of the evaluation activity, advance its scientific quality, strengthen its maneuverability, and ensure its acceptability, if we want to do the work better.
作者 沈苏林
出处 《教师教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第2期73-76,共4页 Teacher Education Research
关键词 学生评教 高校 负面影响 对策 评价手段 教学质量 higher education, student's evaluation, negative influence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 2Feldman, K. A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and extenud (neutral) observers[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989,(30):113-135.
  • 3Marsh, H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility[ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, ( 76 ) :707-754.
  • 4Brandenburg, D. C., Slindle, J. A and Batista, E. E.Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1977,(7):67-78.
  • 5Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1993.
  • 6Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education[ M]. New York: Agathon. 1997.241-320.
  • 7Feldman, K. A. Classsize and students' evaluations of college teacher and courses: A close look [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1984, (21) :45-116.
  • 8McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997,(52) :1218-1225.
  • 9Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) : 1209-1217.
  • 10宋映泉,田勇强.评价课程还是评价教师?——关于影响学评教结果若干因素的实证研究[J].中国高等教育评估,2000(3):37-41. 被引量:45

共引文献110

同被引文献82

引证文献15

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部