期刊文献+

评价方法论研究综述 被引量:20

The Review of Evaluation Methlogy
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 评价方法论是基于评价问题的一般途径和方式方法,其实质就是以一种系统的观点将众多的评价方法以某种形式组织起来,便于理解和选择具体的评价方法.方法论应具有整体性、普遍性、综合性等特点.本文结合国内外评价问题的研究方法以及作者多年来所从事的评价的理论与实践,阐述了评价、评价系统以及评价机理;分析了评价要素、评价程序;梳理了评价方法. Evaluation methodology is the general approaches and means based on evaluation issues. The nature of the methodology is that different evaluation methods are organized at certain manner, so as to easily choose these methods according to specific needs. Methodology should be of integrity, general, and comprehensive. This article combines all kinds of evaluation methods coming from native or abroad and author's academic work. The paper describes evaluation, evaluation system, and evaluation principle. At the same time, evaluation elements and programs are mapped out. At the end, the paper sorts out evaluation methods.
出处 《河北工业大学学报》 CAS 2004年第2期128-134,共7页 Journal of Hebei University of Technology
关键词 评价 评价系统 方法论 评价机理 评价程序 evaluation evaluating system methodology principle of evaluation evaluation program
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1赵丽艳,顾基发.东西方评价方法论对比研究[J].管理科学学报,2000,3(1):87-93. 被引量:45
  • 2柏杰,苏竣,张雅娴.研究与开发评估方法述评[J].科研管理,2000,21(5):70-75. 被引量:16
  • 3李金海.多元回归分析在预测中的应用[J].河北工业大学学报,1996,25(3):57-61. 被引量:32
  • 4Li Jin hai, Alistair Anderson, Richard Harrison. A model framework of manufacturing industry in information era [A]. International conference on E-Commerce Engineering: New Challenges for Global Manufacturing in the 21s1 Century [C], Xi′an China, 2001.
  • 5Jin-hai Li, Alistair R. Anderson, Richard T. Harrison, Total quality management principles and practice in China [J]. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 2003, 20 (9): 1026-1050.
  • 6Anderson Alistair R, Li Jin-hai, Harrison Richard T. The increasing role of small business in the Chinese economy [J]. Journal of small business management, 2003, 41 (3): 310-316.
  • 7Gregory A J. The road to integration Reflections on the development of organizational evaluation theory and practice [J]. Omega International Journal of Management Science, 1996, 24 (3): 295-370.
  • 8Gregory A J, Jackson M C. Evaluation methodologies: asystem of use [J]. Journal of Operational Research Society, 1992, 43 (1): 19-28.
  • 9Smith M F. Evaluation: Preview of the Future [J]. American JournalofEvaluation, 2001, 22 (3): 281-300.
  • 10Smith M F. Evaluation: Review of the past, preview of the future [J]. Evaluation Practice, 1994, 15 (2): 215-227.

二级参考文献42

共引文献121

同被引文献206

引证文献20

二级引证文献84

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部