摘要
行政诉讼“一行为一诉”观念的产生受到民事诉讼及行政执法理念影响,具体规则的形成却更多由行政诉讼实践推动,演进过程中存在不同的方案。最高人民法院在公报案例中对“一行为一诉”立案规则提炼定型,以统一其适用,但并非最优选择。当前,“一行为一诉”规则陷入规范依据缺失、释明义务缺位、实质解纷受阻等困境之中;因而有必要向“一争议一案”方向转型,通过行政争议识别、诉讼请求梳理以及关联行政行为合并,使“一案”与“一争议”范围对应,促推行政诉讼实质化解行政争议功能的实现。
The concept of "One act,One Prosecution" in administrative litigation emerged under the influence of the principles from civil litigation and administrative law enforcement.However,its specific rules have been formed in practical administrative litigation,and there have been different schemes for the rules in this process.The Supreme People's Court has issued gazette cases to summarize and establish "One act,One Prosecution" a s a rule for case filing,so that its application can be unified.However,this rule may not be the optimal solution.Currently,the"One act,One Prosecution"rule faces several dilemmas:its lack of legal basis,courts'inadequate explanations of its application and impediment to substantive resolution of administrative disputes.Therefore,it is necessary to transform it into "One Dispute,One Case" rule.This transformation requires courts to identify administrative disputes,clarify the claims,consolidate related administrative acts,so that the scope of "one case" aligns with that of "one dispute",thus realizing the function of administrative litigation in substantively administrative disputes resolution.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
2025年第6期260-275,共16页
Journal Of CUPL
关键词
“一行为一诉”
具体诉讼请求
起诉条件
行政诉讼
"One act
One Prosecution"
specific claim
conditions for prosecution
administrative litigation
