摘要
生态环境损害赔偿与环境公益诉讼存在诸多共通性,但两者在诉讼规则上存在着不同,如性质属性、起诉主体、起诉条件等方面的不同。这两种制度在实践中存在着冲突困境,其主要原因之一就是没有准确地将二者划分为诉讼功能。所以未来应明确生态环境损害诉讼的“赔偿性”功能,明确环境民事公益诉讼的“赔偿性”功能与“预防性”功能,并以“预防性”功能为主导,实现对行政机关提起赔偿诉讼功能不足的补充。为充分实现二者的衔接,本文对生态环境损害赔偿制度与环境公益诉讼协同衔接的必要性进行分析,并提出相应的完善措施,旨在促进环境保护。
There are many commonalities between ecological environment damage compensation and environmental public interest litigation,but there are differences in litigation rules between the two,such as differences in nature,subject of prosecution and conditions of prosecution.These two systems face conflict dilemmas in practice,and one of the main reasons is that they have not been accurately divided into litigation functions.Therefore,in the future,it is necessary to clarify the"compensatory"function of ecological environment damage litigation,and clarify the"compensatory"and"preventive"functions of environmental civil public interest litigation,with the"preventive"function as the leading role,so as to supplement the insufficient function of administrative organs in initiating compensation litigation.To fully realize the connection between the two,this paper analyzes the necessity of coordinated connection between the ecological environment damage compensation system and environmental public interest litigation,and puts forward corresponding improvement measures,aiming to promote environmental protection benefits.
作者
杨漫漫
YANG Manman(Bozhou Municipal Bureau of Ecology and Environment,Bozhou 236800,China)
出处
《黑龙江环境通报》
2025年第11期168-170,共3页
Heilongjiang Environmental Journal
关键词
生态环境损害赔偿
环境公益诉讼
衔接
ecological environment damage compensation
environmental public interest litigation
connection
