期刊文献+

重症患者镇静镇痛后发生谵妄的影响因素

Influencing factors of delirium after sedation and analgesia in critically ill patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析重症患者镇静镇痛后发生谵妄的影响因素。方法:回顾性分析2018年1月至2023年11月该院收治的110例重症患者的临床资料,采用重症监护谵妄筛查量表(ICDSC)评估患者谵妄情况,根据是否发生谵妄将其分为谵妄组和未谵妄组。收集患者基线资料,采用Logistic回归分析重症患者镇静镇痛后发生谵妄的影响因素。结果:110例重症患者镇静镇痛后,52例发生谵妄,58例未发生谵妄,谵妄发生率为47.27%;两组性别、体质量指数、合并冠心病、合并高血压、合并糖尿病比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);谵妄组年龄>65岁、合并脑血管疾病、合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病、使用阿片类药物、镇静镇痛药物使用时间≥35 h、呼吸机使用时间≥49.5 h、住院时间≥5 d、无家属探视、C反应蛋白水平≥148.57 mg/L、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分≥5.1分、急性生理与慢性健康评分系统Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分≥13.06分、躁动-镇静量表(RASS)评分≥-3.79分占比均高于未谵妄组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析结果显示,年龄>65岁、合并脑血管疾病、住院时间≥5 d、无家属探视、APACHEⅡ评分≥13.06分、RASS评分≥-3.79分均为重症患者镇静镇痛后发生谵妄的危险因素(OR>1,P<0.05)。结论:年龄>65岁、合并脑血管疾病、住院时间≥5 d、无家属探视、APACHEⅡ评分≥13.06分、RASS评分≥-3.79分均为重症患者镇静镇痛后发生谵妄的危险因素。 Objective:To analyze influencing factors of delirium after sedation and analgesia in critically ill patients.Methods:The clinical data of 110 critically ill patients admitted to the hospital from January 2018 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.The ICU delirium screening scale(ICDSC)was used to evaluate the delirium of these patients.According to the occurrence of delirium,they were divided into delirium group and non-delirium group.The baseline data of these patients were collected.The influencing factors of delirium after sedation and analgesia in the critically ill patients were analyzed.Results:Among the 110 critically ill patients,52 cases suffered from delirium,58 cases did not have delirium,the incidence of delirium was 47.27%.There were no significant differences in gender,body mass index,coronary heart disease,combined hypertension and combined diabetes mellitus between the two groups(P>0.05).The proportions of the patients with age>65 years old,combined cerebrovascular disease,combined chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,use of opioid drugs,duration of sedative and analgesic drugs≥35 h,duration of ventilator use≥49.5 h,hospitalization time≥5 d,no family visit,C-reactive protein≥148.57 mg/L,sequential organ failure assessment(SOFA)score≥5.1 points,acute physiology and chronic health scoring system II(APACHE II)score≥13.06 points,and Richmond agitation-sedation scale(RASS)score≥-3.79 points in the delirium group were higher than those in the non-delirium group,and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that age>65 years old,combined cerebrovascular disease,hospitalization time≥5 d,no family visit,APACHE II score≥13.06 points,RASS score≥-3.79 points were risk factors for delirium after sedation and analgesia in the critically ill patients(OR>1,P<0.05).Conclusions:Age>65 years old,combined cerebrovascular disease,hospitalization time≥5 days,no family visit,APACHE II score≥13.06,and RASS score≥-3.79 are the risk factors for delirium after sedation and analgesia in the critically ill patients.
作者 齐艳坡 闫圣杰 陈俊 廖煜 QI Yanpo;YAN Shengjie;CHEN Jun;LIAO Yu(Intensive Care Unit of Zhengzhou First People’s Hospital,Zhengzhou 450000 Henan,China)
出处 《中国民康医学》 2025年第24期1-4,共4页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 重症 镇静 镇痛 谵妄 影响因素 Critical illness Sedation Analgesia Delirium Influencing factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献81

  • 1李宏伟,李振宇.精神科病房所见谵妄及临床分析[J].广东医学,2004,25(10):1176-1178. 被引量:3
  • 2翁巍骏.地西泮治疗无抽搐ECT后意识障碍[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(3):158-159. 被引量:13
  • 3彭娅.贾振飞,程刚.丙泊酚及其制剂的研究进展[J].中国药剂学杂志,2012,10(1):17-25.
  • 4JONES A E, SAAK K, KLINE J A. Performance of the mortality in ED sepsis score for predicting hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Am J Emerg Med,2008,26:689--692.
  • 5JONES A E, FOCHT A, HORTON J M, et al. Pro spective external validation of the clinical effectiveness of an emergency department based early goal directed therapy protocol for severe sepsis and septic shock [J]. Chest, 2007,32 : 425 -- 432.
  • 6JONES A E, FITCH M T, KLINE J A. Operational performance of validated physiologic scoring systems for predicting in-hospital mortality among critically ill emergency department patients E J]. Crit Care Med, 2005,33974--978.
  • 7SANKOFF J D,GOYAL M,GAIESKI D F,et al. Val- idation of the Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score in patients with the systemic in- flammatory response syndrome (SIRS) [J]. Crit Care Med, 2008,36 : 421 -- 426.
  • 8VINCENT J L, MORENO R, TAKALA J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure[J]. Inten-sive Care Med,1996,22707--710.
  • 9FERREIRA F L, BOTA D P, BROSS A, et al. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients [J]. JAMA, 2001,286.. J754 -- 1758.
  • 10MORENO R, VINCENT J L, MATOS R, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dys- function/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospec tive,multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis re- lated Problems of the ESICM[J]. Intensive Care Med, 1999,25:686--696.

共引文献157

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部