期刊文献+

人工智能对党的意识形态领导权、话语权和管理权挑战与对策探析

Analysis of the challenges and countermeasures of artificial intelligence to the Party's ideological leadership,discourse power and administration
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 人工智能技术的深度演进以前所未有的广度和深度渗透社会思想文化场域,对党在意识形态领域的话语权、领导权与管理权行使构成系统性挑战。其挑战具体表现为,算法推荐机制催生的“信息茧房”效应加剧公众认知分化,削弱社会共识基础,冲击主流话语权的引导效能;深度伪造技术滋生的海量高拟真虚假信息流,动摇权威信息源与社会信任,威胁国家政治安全生态;算法潜在偏见与“黑箱”特性使意识形态的价值引领面临精准度困境,并为高效能治理设置了新的障碍。应对上述系统性挑战,需构建涵盖价值引领、制度体系和技术治理的协同治理框架,着力强化马克思主义在算法伦理和技术方向上的指导力以夯实意识形态领导权,健全协同高效的法规与监管体系来落实管理权,并创新性地运用智能技术提升算法透明度与可解释性,在赋能话语权的同时,筑牢技术风险的防范堤坝。 The deep evolution of artificial intelligence technology has penetrated into the social ideological and cultural field with unprecedented breadth and depth,posing a systematic challenge to the Party's discourse power,leadership and administration in the ideological field.The challenges are specifically manifested in the fact that the"information cocoons"effect generated by the algorithmic recommendation mechanism intensifies the public cognitive differentiation,weakens the foundation of social consensus,and impacts the guiding effectiveness of mainstream discourse power.The massive flow of highly realistic false information generated by deepfake technology shakes authoritative information sources and social trust,posing a threat to the national political security ecosystem.The potential bias and"black box"nature of algorithms pose a precision dilemma for the value guidance of ideology and set new obstacles for efficient governance.To address the systemic challenges mentioned above,we need to build a collaborative governance framework that covers value leadership,institutional systems,and technological governance.We should focus on strengthening the guidance of Marxism in algorithmic ethics and technological directions to consolidate ideological leadership,improve collaborative and efficient regulatory and supervisory systems to implement administration,and innovatively use intelligent technology to enhance the transparency and interpretability of algorithms.While empowering the discourse power,we should also build a solid defense barrier against technological risks.
作者 刘先江 李成 LIU Xianjiang;LI Cheng(Hunan Normal University,Changsha 410081 China)
出处 《新余学院学报》 2025年第5期11-19,共9页 Journal of Xinyu University
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目“自然辩证法中国化及当代创新研究”(20&ZD043)。
关键词 人工智能 意识形态安全 领导权 管理权 话语权 算法治理 artificial intelligence ideological security leadership administration discourse power algorithm governance
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

二级参考文献295

共引文献881

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部