摘要
传统理论将生态环境损害赔偿制度法理基础定位为权利本位或义务本位,导致实践中存在责任主体模糊、赔偿范围局限、程序衔接失当等问题。生态环境损害赔偿本质上具有权义复合特征,国家作为自然资源所有者的同时承担环境公共信托义务。基于此,应从以下三层次重构路径:在实体层面建立“权利-义务-责任”的复合规范结构;在程序层面构建公私法协同机制,统合行政磋商与司法救济程序;在制度层面确立“损害担责”与“风险预防”相结合的归责原则,完善生态环境服务功能损失的量化评估标准。
Traditional theories have positioned the legal basis of the ecological environment damage compensation system either as rights-based or obligations-based,leading to practical issues such as ambiguous liability subjects,limited compensation scope,and inappropriate procedural coordination.The ecological environment damage compensation has the characteristics of right-obligation compound in essence.;the state,as the owner of natural resources,simultaneously bears the public trust obligation for environmental protection.Based on this understanding,the path should be reconstructed from the following three levels:establishing a composite normative structure of"rights-obligations-liabilities"at the substantive level;constructing a public-private law coordination mechanism to integrate administrative consultation and judicial relief procedures at the procedural level;and formulating a liability principle that combines"polluter pays"with"risk prevention"at the institutional level,while improving quantitative assessment standards for ecological environment service function losses.
作者
周愿垚
Zhou Yuanyao(Pingba District People's Court,Anshun,Guizhou 561000)
出处
《天津法学》
2025年第3期85-93,共9页
Tianjin Legal Science
关键词
生态环境损害赔偿
法理基础
权利义务复合
ecological environment damage compensation
legal basis
right-obligation compound
