摘要
美国区域研究承袭西欧,发轫于二战,在冷战时期充分发展,并随着冷战的结束而逐渐进入新的调整时期。整体来看,在自由放任理念和政府需求驱动下,美国区域研究先后经历以区域为中心、以学科为中心和以问题为中心的发展路径,形成霸权主义的驱动下的权力与知识的相互构建、话语竞争与知识霸权互为补充、全球化与知识政治互动的局面,共同服务于美国国家利益在全球层面扩展的知识政治逻辑。同时,新世纪以来,美国区域研究所面临的人文学科与社会科学之间的学科主体性之争、知识生产与资政服务关系之争、国家主义与自由主义关系之争等问题日益尖锐,在本质上是权力、资本和知识合谋的结果。
American regional studies,initially an extension of the European academic tradition,boosted during the Second World War,prospered in the Cold War period and with the Cold War coming to an end,it gradually entered a new adjustment period.On the whole,is driven by laissez-faire philosophy and government-demands,American regional studies successively experienced the region-centered,discipline-centered,problem-centered evolution approach,thus forming a situation in which power and knowledge are mutually constructed,under the impetus of hegemonism,with discourse competition and knowledge hegemony complement to each other,and with the globalization and the knowledge politics interacting with each other.These factors jointly serve the logic of knowledge politics by which the U.S.national interest expands on a global scale.Meanwhile,the American regional research institutes have been facing increasingly acute problems such as the dispute over the subjectivity of disciplines between humanities and social sciences,the dispute over the relationship between the production of knowledge and the service of capitalism,and the dispute over the relationship between statism and liberalism,and these are essentially the result of a collusion among power,capital and knowledge.
作者
翟石磊
陈惠
ZHAI Shi-lei;CHEN Hui(Center for Australian Studies,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou,Jiangsu 221116,China;Foreign Studies College,Hunan Normal University,Changsha,Hunan 410081,China)
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
北大核心
2025年第4期164-170,共7页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“中国式现代化的国际传播路径研究”(23JZD033)
江苏省社科应用研究精品工程(外语类)“共生理论视域下区域国别学与外语学科的融合路径研究”(24SWC-05)。
关键词
美国区域研究
知识政治逻辑
霸权主义
权力
资本
American regional studies
political logic of knowledge
hegemony
power
capital
