摘要
近年来,为打击无人机违规闯入飞行禁区的行为,国家开始推行无人机围栏,但市面上也随之出现了诸多提供破解无人机围栏程序的行为。对该行为如何定罪存在多种观点。无人机围栏属于刑法意义上的计算机信息系统,提供破解无人机围栏程序行为在形式上的确符合破坏计算机信息系统罪的帮助犯。但因提供行为已在《刑法修正案(七)》中被正犯化,为了准确评价提供破解无人机围栏程序行为的危害性,实现帮助行为正犯化的立法目的,故提供破解无人机围栏程序行为不应适用破坏计算机信息系统罪,而宜以提供侵入、非法控制计算机信息系统程序、工具罪对该行为定罪量刑。
In recent years,to combat the“illegal flight”of unmanned aerial vehicles(UAVs),the state has im-plemented UAV fences.Concurrently,the market has seen numerous acts of providing programs to crack UAV fences,giving rise to divergent views on how to convict such behaviors.UAV fences fall within the scope of computer information systems as defined by criminal law.Formally,providing UAV fence cracking programs aligns with the accessory offense of the crime of damaging computer information systems.However,since the act of providing such programs has been criminalized as a principal offense in the Criminal Law Amendment(VII),to accurately evaluate the harmfulness of these acts and fulfill the legislative purpose of principal offenderization of aiding behaviors,it is inappropriate to apply the crime of damaging computer information systems.Instead,such acts should be convicted and punished under the crime of providing programs or tools for invading or illegally controlling computer information systems.
作者
吕云霞
Yunxia Lyu(School of Law,Civil Aviation University of China,Tianjin)
出处
《争议解决》
2025年第8期77-82,共6页
Dispute Settlement
基金
2024年中国民航大学研究生科研创新项目“无人机禁飞、限高破解行为的刑法评价研究”(编号:2024YJSKC11001)研究成果。
关键词
破解无人机围栏
破坏计算机信息系统罪
提供行为
Cracking UAV Fences
Crime of Damaging Computer Information Systems
Aiding Act
