期刊文献+

不同剂量沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗慢性心衰的临床效果分析

Clinical effect analysis of different doses of sacubitril valsartan sodium in the treatment of chronic heart failure
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:分析不同剂量沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠治疗慢性心衰的临床效果。方法:选取2024年2月至2025年2月我院慢性心衰患者144例,按照药物剂量分为低剂量组、中剂量组、高剂量组(n=48),分别口服沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠50 mg Bid、100 mg Bid、200 mg Bid治疗。治疗3 m后,以彩色超声诊断仪检测左心室射血分数(Left ventricular ejection fraction,LVEF)、左心室舒张末期内径(Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,LVEDD)、左心室收缩末期内径(Left ventricular end-systolic diameter,LVESD)水平;以黄嘌呤氧化酶法检测超氧化物歧化酶(Superoxide dismutase,SOD),硝酸还原酶法测定一氧化氮(Nitric oxide,NO)水平,硫代巴比妥酸法检测丙二醛(Malondialdehyde,MDA);治疗3 m后,以酶联免疫吸附法测定白细胞介素-6(Interleukin-6,IL-6)、超敏C反应蛋白(High-sensitivity C reactive protein,hs-CRP)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(Tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α);治疗3 m后,记录6 min步行距离(6 min walking test,6MWT);以明尼苏达州心力衰竭生活质量问卷(Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire,MLHFQ)评估生活质量;比较三组不良反应。结果:高剂量组治疗效率为91.67%,高于低剂量组62.50%、中剂量组75.00%(P<0.05),且有剂量依赖性;用药后,高剂量组LVEF、LVEDD、LVESD、SOD、NO、MDA、IL-6、hs-CRP、TNF-α、6MWT、MLHFQ评分均优于低剂量组、中剂量组(P<0.05);高剂量组不良反应发生率为12.50%,与低剂量组4.17%、中剂量组8.33%比较无显著差异(P>0.05)。结论:慢性心衰应用高剂量沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠疗效显著,可改善心功能、炎性因子、生活质量指标。 Objective:To analyze the clinical effects of different doses of sacubitril valsartan sodium in the treatment of chronic heart failure.Methods:A total of 144 patients with chronic heart failure in our hospital were selected from February 2024 to February 2025,and were divided into low-dose group,medium-dose group,and high-dose group(n=48)according to the drug dose,and were treated with sacubitril valsartan sodium 50 mg Bid,100 mg Bid,and 200 mg Bid by oral administration,respectively.After 3 months of treatment,left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF),left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD),left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVEDD),and left ventricular end-systolic diameter(LVEDD)were detected by color ultrasound diagnostic instrument,Malondialdehyde(MDA)was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA),interleukin-6(IL-6),high-sensitivity C reactive protein(hs-CRP),tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α)were measured by ELISA.After 3 months of treatment,6 min walking test(6MWT)was recorded,the quality of life was assessed by Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire(MLHFQ),and adverse effects were recorded.Results:The therapeutic efficiency of the high-dose group was 91.67%,which was higher than 62.50%in the low-dose group and 75.00%in the medium-dose group(P<0.05),and there was a dose-dependence.After the administration of the drug,the scores of LVEF,LVEDD,LVESD,SOD,NO,MDA,IL-6,hs-CRP,TNF-α,6MWT,and MLHFQ of the high-dose group were better than those of the low-dose group and medium-dose group(P<0.05).The incidence of adverse reactions in the high-dose group was 12.50%,which was not significantly different from 4.17%in the low-dose group and 8.33%in the medium-dose group(P>0.05).Conclusion:The efficacy of applying high-dose sacubitril valsartan sodium in chronic heart failure is remarkable,which can improve cardiac function,inflammatory factors,and quality of life indicators.
作者 郭梦雪 李志英 Guo Meng-xue;Li Zhi-ying(Department of Pharmacy,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College,Nanyang 473000,Henan,China;Department of Cardiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanyang Medical College,Nanyang 473000,Henan,China)
出处 《四川生理科学杂志》 2025年第8期1737-1740,共4页
关键词 慢性心衰 沙库巴曲缬沙坦钠 心功能 运动耐力 Chronic heart failure Sacubitril valsartan sodium Cardiac function Exercise tolerance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献171

  • 1张皓,安焕平,吕果,党群,田宝莹,王芳.沙库巴曲缬沙坦对心力衰竭患者相关炎症因子的影响[J].武警后勤学院学报(医学版),2020(6):6-9. 被引量:4
  • 2张芝芝.温阳化瘀汤联合沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗慢性心力衰竭的临床疗效观察[J].反射疗法与康复医学,2022,3(3):5-7. 被引量:2
  • 3张克清,王金周,李海良,邢志敏,贾海莲,王泽荣,裴国宪.中西医结合综合管理对慢性心力衰竭患者心功能及生活质量的影响[J].光明中医,2020(6):898-901. 被引量:10
  • 4王方正,张澍,黄德嘉,华伟,孙宝贵,沈法荣,吴书林,王建安,方全,吴立群,王景峰,王冬梅,郭涛,陈新,中华医学会心电生理和起搏分会心脏再同步治疗专家工作组.心脏再同步治疗慢性心力衰竭的建议[J].中华心律失常学杂志,2006,10(2):90-102. 被引量:91
  • 5Colucci WS. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of myocardial failure. Am J Cardiol, 1997, 80(11A) : 15L-25L
  • 6Braunwald E,Bristow MR Congestive heart failure: fifty years of progress. Circulation, 2000, 102(20 Suppl 4) : Ⅳ14-23.
  • 7Hunt SA, Abraham WT, Chin MH, et al. ACC/AHA 2005 Guideline Update for the Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Heart Failure in the Adult: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure) : developed in collaboration with the American College of Chest Physicians and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation, 2005, 112 (12) :e154-235.
  • 8Swedberg K, Cleland J, Dargie H, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic heart failure: executive summary ( update 2005 ):The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2005, 26(11): 1115-1140.
  • 9Arnold JM, Liu P, Demers C, et al. Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus conference recommendations on heart failure 2006 : diagnosis and management. Can J Cardiol, 2006, 22 (1): 23-45.
  • 10Heart Failure Society of America. HFSA 2006 Comprehensive Heart Failure Practice Guideline. J Card Fail, 2006, 12 ( 1 ) : e1-2.

共引文献4047

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部